The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of TopSpin360 Training Device

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06052553
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 25, 2023
Last Update Posted : April 9, 2024
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Michael J. Stuart MD, Mayo Clinic

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE September 18, 2023
First Posted Date  ICMJE September 25, 2023
Last Update Posted Date April 9, 2024
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE September 9, 2023
Estimated Primary Completion Date December 2025   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: October 19, 2023)
  • Change in peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, maximal load in kilograms that could be applied to head before deviation from neutral position.
  • Change in normalized peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, peak force divided by participant weight in kilograms.
  • Change in force steadiness [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, average peak force.
  • Change in rate of force development (RFD) [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Automatically collected by the TopSpin360 device, the multi-planar rate of force development (RFD) in pounds of force per second collected in both clockwise and counterclockwise.
  • Change in visuo-motor reaction time [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, reported in milliseconds (ms)
  • Change in blood biomarker levels [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Blood will be at a biomarker level. We will investigate 5 different markers: NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF. Each biomarker will be measured in Nanograms per Milliliter (ng/ml).
  • Change in salivary biomarkers [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Salivary biomarkers are relatively new and we will investigate to see if NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF. Each biomarker will be measured in Nanometer per milliliter (ng/ml).
  • Change in N100 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in N100 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in P300 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in P300 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores
  • Change in N400 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential amplitude. Increased amplitudes are indicative of larger signals. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in N400 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 22, 2023)
  • Change in peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, maximal load in kilograms that could be applied to head before deviation from neutral position.
  • Change in normalized peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, peak force divided by participant weight in kilograms.
  • Change in force steadiness [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, average peak force.
  • Change in rate of force development (RFD) [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Automatically collected by the TopSpin360 device, the multi-planar rate of force development (RFD) in pounds of force per second collected in both clockwise and counterclockwise.
  • Change in visuo-motor reaction time [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Measured by a neck isometric device, reported in milliseconds (ms)
  • Change in blood biomarker levels [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Blood will be at a biomarker level. We will investigate 5 different markers: NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF.
  • Change in salivary biomarkers [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Salivary biomarkers are relatively new and we will investigate to see if NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF.
  • Change in N100 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in N100 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in P300 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in P300 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores
  • Change in N400 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential amplitude. Increased amplitudes are indicative of larger signals. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
  • Change in N400 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
    Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 22, 2023)
Change in King-Devick Test (KDT) scores [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
A rapid number-naming test that requires individuals to read 3 numbered patters aloud as fast as possible, the resulting time if the KDT score. The post-season score is compared to the pre-season baseline. An increase in the number of seconds required to read the 3 number patterns is considered to be significant.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Study of TopSpin360 Training Device
Official Title  ICMJE The Effectiveness of a Novel Neck Training Device on Objective Neck Strength and Cognitive Measures in Junior A Hockey Players
Brief Summary This research is being done to investigate the novel neck strengthening device, TopSpin360 and its effectiveness on measures of neck strength and cognitive function
Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Condition  ICMJE Healthy
Intervention  ICMJE Device: TopSpin360
Helmet training device used to train head to stay stable during jarring impacts through dynamic and multi-planar neck strengthening.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • No Intervention: Control Group
    Subjects will receive no intervention for the duration of the hockey season.
  • Experimental: TopSpin360 Intervention Group
    Subjects will use TopSpin360, twice- weekly and use for the duration of the hockey season.
    Intervention: Device: TopSpin360
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: September 22, 2023)
60
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE December 2025
Estimated Primary Completion Date December 2025   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fluent English Speaker.
  • Medically cleared to play ice hockey.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically documented hearing issues.
  • In-ear hearing aid or cochlear implant.
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator.
  • Metal or plastic implants in skull. lack of verbal fluency in the English language.
  • History of seizures.
  • Allergy to rubbing alcohol or EEG gel.
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years to 21 Years   (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE Yes
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: Houston Hawkins 507-293-3295 Hawkins.Houston@mayo.edu
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT06052553
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE 23-005197
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: No
Current Responsible Party Michael J. Stuart MD, Mayo Clinic
Original Responsible Party Michael J. Stuart, Mayo Clinic, Principal Investigator
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Mayo Clinic
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: Michael Stuart, MD Mayo Clinic
PRS Account Mayo Clinic
Verification Date April 2024

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP