September 18, 2023
|
September 25, 2023
|
April 9, 2024
|
September 9, 2023
|
December 2025 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
- Change in peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, maximal load in kilograms that could be applied to head before deviation from neutral position.
- Change in normalized peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, peak force divided by participant weight in kilograms.
- Change in force steadiness [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, average peak force.
- Change in rate of force development (RFD) [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Automatically collected by the TopSpin360 device, the multi-planar rate of force development (RFD) in pounds of force per second collected in both clockwise and counterclockwise.
- Change in visuo-motor reaction time [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, reported in milliseconds (ms)
- Change in blood biomarker levels [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Blood will be at a biomarker level. We will investigate 5 different markers: NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF. Each biomarker will be measured in Nanograms per Milliliter (ng/ml).
- Change in salivary biomarkers [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Salivary biomarkers are relatively new and we will investigate to see if NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF. Each biomarker will be measured in Nanometer per milliliter (ng/ml).
- Change in N100 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in N100 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in P300 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in P300 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores
- Change in N400 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential amplitude. Increased amplitudes are indicative of larger signals. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in N400 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
|
- Change in peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, maximal load in kilograms that could be applied to head before deviation from neutral position.
- Change in normalized peak force [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, peak force divided by participant weight in kilograms.
- Change in force steadiness [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, average peak force.
- Change in rate of force development (RFD) [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Automatically collected by the TopSpin360 device, the multi-planar rate of force development (RFD) in pounds of force per second collected in both clockwise and counterclockwise.
- Change in visuo-motor reaction time [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Measured by a neck isometric device, reported in milliseconds (ms)
- Change in blood biomarker levels [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Blood will be at a biomarker level. We will investigate 5 different markers: NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF.
- Change in salivary biomarkers [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Salivary biomarkers are relatively new and we will investigate to see if NfL, SNCB, vWF, SNCA, and BDNF.
- Change in N100 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in N100 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N100 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in P300 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in P300 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity P300 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores
- Change in N400 Amplitude [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential amplitude. Increased amplitudes are indicative of larger signals. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
- Change in N400 Latency [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ]
Electroencephalograph (EEG) recording of brain electrical activity N400 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores.
|
|
Change in King-Devick Test (KDT) scores [ Time Frame: Baseline, post-season (approximately 6 months) ] A rapid number-naming test that requires individuals to read 3 numbered patters aloud as fast as possible, the resulting time if the KDT score. The post-season score is compared to the pre-season baseline. An increase in the number of seconds required to read the 3 number patterns is considered to be significant.
|
Same as current
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
A Study of TopSpin360 Training Device
|
The Effectiveness of a Novel Neck Training Device on Objective Neck Strength and Cognitive Measures in Junior A Hockey Players
|
This research is being done to investigate the novel neck strengthening device, TopSpin360 and its effectiveness on measures of neck strength and cognitive function
|
Not Provided
|
Interventional
|
Not Applicable
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Basic Science
|
Healthy
|
Device: TopSpin360
Helmet training device used to train head to stay stable during jarring impacts through dynamic and multi-planar neck strengthening.
|
- No Intervention: Control Group
Subjects will receive no intervention for the duration of the hockey season.
- Experimental: TopSpin360 Intervention Group
Subjects will use TopSpin360, twice- weekly and use for the duration of the hockey season.
Intervention: Device: TopSpin360
|
Not Provided
|
|
Recruiting
|
60
|
Same as current
|
December 2025
|
December 2025 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fluent English Speaker.
- Medically cleared to play ice hockey.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinically documented hearing issues.
- In-ear hearing aid or cochlear implant.
- Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator.
- Metal or plastic implants in skull. lack of verbal fluency in the English language.
- History of seizures.
- Allergy to rubbing alcohol or EEG gel.
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years to 21 Years (Adult)
|
Yes
|
|
United States
|
|
|
NCT06052553
|
23-005197
|
No
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
Yes |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: |
No |
|
|
Michael J. Stuart MD, Mayo Clinic
|
Michael J. Stuart, Mayo Clinic, Principal Investigator
|
Mayo Clinic
|
Same as current
|
Not Provided
|
Principal Investigator: |
Michael Stuart, MD |
Mayo Clinic |
|
Mayo Clinic
|
April 2024
|