The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 1 for:    MK 2870 010
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

A Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) as a Single Agent and in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With HR+/HER2- Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (MK-2870-010)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06312176
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : March 15, 2024
Last Update Posted : May 7, 2024
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE March 7, 2024
First Posted Date  ICMJE March 15, 2024
Last Update Posted Date May 7, 2024
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE April 14, 2024
Estimated Primary Completion Date July 11, 2027   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 5, 2024)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) ( sacituzumab tirumotecan versus treatment of physician's choice [TPC]; pembrolizumab + sacituzumab tirumotecan versus TPC) [ Time Frame: Up to ~38 months ]
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first as assessed by Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) will be presented.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 7, 2024)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (MK-2870 versus treatment of physician's choice [TPC]; MK-2870 + pembrolizumab versus TPC) [ Time Frame: Up to ~38 months ]
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first as assessed by Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) will be presented.
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 5, 2024)
  • Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (pembrolizumab + sacituzumab tirumotecan + versus sacituzumab tirumotecan) [ Time Frame: Up to ~57 months ]
    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first as assessed by Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) will be presented.
  • Objective Response Rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: Up to ~57 months ]
    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). The percentage of participants who experience CR or PR as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) will be presented.
  • Duration of Response (DOR) [ Time Frame: Up to ~57 months ]
    For participants who demonstrate a confirmed Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. DOR as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) will be presented.
  • Change from baseline in global health status/quality of life scores, on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status.
  • Change from baseline in physical functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of physical functioning.
  • Change from baseline in emotional functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their emotional functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of emotional functioning.
  • Change from baseline in fatigue score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their fatigue are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function.
  • Change from baseline in diarrhea score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question "Have you had diarrhea?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function.
  • Time to first Deterioration (TTD) in global health status/quality of life scores, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in global health status/quality of life combined score.
  • TTD in physical functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of physical functioning. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the physical functioning score.
  • TTD in emotional functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their emotional functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of emotional functioning. TD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the emotional functioning score.
  • TTD in fatigue score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their fatigue are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the fatigue score.
  • TTD in diarrhea score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question about their diarrhea are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the diarrhea score.
  • Number of participants who experience one or more adverse events (AEs) [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
  • Number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 7, 2024)
  • Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (MK-2870 + pembrolizumab versus MK-2870) [ Time Frame: Up to ~57 months ]
    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first as assessed by Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) will be presented.
  • Objective Response Rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: Up to ~57 months ]
    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). The percentage of participants who experience CR or PR as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) will be presented.
  • Duration of Response (DOR) [ Time Frame: Up to ~57 months ]
    For participants who demonstrate a confirmed Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. DOR as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) will be presented.
  • Change from baseline in global health status/quality of life scores, on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status.
  • Change from baseline in physical functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of physical functioning.
  • Change from baseline in emotional functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their emotional functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of emotional functioning.
  • Change from baseline in fatigue score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their fatigue are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function.
  • Change from baseline in diarrhea score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question "Have you had diarrhea?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function.
  • Time to first Deterioration (TTD) in global health status/quality of life scores, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in global health status/quality of life combined score.
  • TTD in physical functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of physical functioning. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the physical functioning score.
  • TTD in emotional functioning score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their emotional functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better level of emotional functioning. TD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the emotional functioning score.
  • TTD in fatigue score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions about their fatigue are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the fatigue score.
  • TTD in diarrhea score, on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question about their diarrhea are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better level of function. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point deterioration from baseline in the diarrhea score.
  • Number of participants who experience one or more adverse events (AEs) [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
  • Number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE [ Time Frame: Up to ~77 months ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) as a Single Agent and in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With HR+/HER2- Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (MK-2870-010)
Official Title  ICMJE An Open-label, Randomized Phase 3 Study of MK-2870 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With HR+/HER2- Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan as a single agent, and in combination with pembrolizumab, versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in participants with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic, breast cancer.

The primary hypotheses are that sacituzumab tirumotecan as a single agent and sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab are superior to TPC with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in all participants.

Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 3
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Breast Neoplasms
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: Sacituzumab tirumotecan
    IV infusion
    Other Name: MK-2870
  • Biological: Pembrolizumab
    IV infusion
    Other Names:
    • MK-3475
    • KEYTRUDA®
  • Drug: Paclitaxel
    IV infusion
    Other Name: TAXOL®
  • Drug: Nab-paclitaxel
    IV infusion
    Other Name: ABRAXANE®
  • Drug: Capecitabine
    oral tablet
    Other Name: XELODA®
  • Drug: Liposomal doxorubicin
    IV infusion
    Other Name: DOXIL®
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: Arm A: Sacituzumab tirumotecan
    Participants receive 4 mg/kg of sacituzumab tirumotecan once every 2 weeks (Q2W) via intravenous (IV) infusion until progressive disease or discontinuation.
    Intervention: Drug: Sacituzumab tirumotecan
  • Experimental: Arm B:Pembrolizumab + Sacituzumab tirumotecan
    Participants receive 4 mg/kg of sacituzumab tirumotecan Q2W via IV infusion until progressive disease or discontinuation PLUS 400 mg of pembrolizumab once every 6 weeks (Q6W) via IV infusion for up to 18 administrations (up to ~2 years).
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Sacituzumab tirumotecan
    • Biological: Pembrolizumab
  • Active Comparator: Arm C: Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC)
    At the physician's discretion, participants receive chemotherapy of 80 mg/m^2 of paclitaxel once every week (Q1W) via IV infusion OR 90 mg/m^2 of paclitaxel once every 4 weeks (Q4W) via IV infusion OR 100 mg/m^2 of nab-paclitaxel Q4W via IV infusion OR 1000 mg/m^2 of capecitabine every 3 weeks (Q3W) orally OR 50 mg/m^2 of liposomal doxorubicin once every 4 weeks (Q4W) via IV infusion, until progressive disease or discontinuation.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Paclitaxel
    • Drug: Nab-paclitaxel
    • Drug: Capecitabine
    • Drug: Liposomal doxorubicin
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: March 7, 2024)
1200
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE Same as current
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE April 12, 2031
Estimated Primary Completion Date July 11, 2027   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has unresectable locally advanced or metastatic centrally-confirmed hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer
  • Has radiographic disease progression on one or more lines of endocrine therapy for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, with one in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor
  • Is a chemotherapy candidate
  • Has an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 assessed within 7 days before randomization
  • Has adequate organ function
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected participants must have well controlled HIV on antiretroviral therapy
  • Participants who are Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive are eligible if they have received HBV antiviral therapy for at least 4 weeks, and have undetectable HBV viral load
  • Participants with a history of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are eligible if HCV viral load is undetectable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has breast cancer amenable to treatment with curative intent
  • Has experienced an early recurrence (<6 months after completing adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and therefore is eligible to receive second-line (2L) treatment
  • Has symptomatic advanced/metastatic visceral spread at risk of rapidly evolving into life-threatening complications
  • Has received prior chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
  • Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years
  • History of (noninfectious) pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease that requires steroids, or has current pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease
  • Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE
Contact: Toll Free Number 1-888-577-8839 Trialsites@merck.com
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Israel,   Taiwan,   United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT06312176
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE 2870-010
MK-2870-010 ( Other Identifier: Merck )
2023-504918-29 ( Registry Identifier: EU CT )
U1111-1289-8119 ( Other Identifier: UTN )
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
URL: http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php
Current Responsible Party Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Original Responsible Party Same as current
Current Study Sponsor  ICMJE Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Original Study Sponsor  ICMJE Same as current
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Director: Medical Director Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
PRS Account Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Verification Date May 2024

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP