Phase III Trial of Anaplastic Glioma Without 1p/19q Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) (CATNON)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00626990 |
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : February 29, 2008
Results First Posted : September 11, 2023
Last Update Posted : September 11, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: None (Open Label); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors |
Interventions |
Drug: temozolomide Genetic: DNA methylation analysis Other: laboratory biomarker analysis Procedure: adjuvant therapy Procedure: quality-of-life assessment Radiation: radiation therapy |
Enrollment | 751 |
Recruitment Details | After registration step was completed, eligible patients were randomized into the trial within 8 days from the start of radiotherapy; at this time, all baseline requirements for the study had to be fulfilled. |
Pre-assignment Details | The patients were first registered to the trial by authorized sites. For all patients, tumor and blood samples had to be sent for histology review, 1p/19q analysis and O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) assay. If inclusion was based on central pathology and 1p/19q diagnosis the patient could be randomized into the trial once found eligible at central assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | RT Alone | RT & Concurrent CT | RT + Adjuvant CT | RT & Concurrent CT + Adjuvant CT |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
radiation therapy alone DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy temozolomide: Patients randomized to concomitant temozolomide will receive temozolomide continuously at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² during radiotherapy. DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Radiotherapy plus adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy temozolomide: Patients randomized to concomitant temozolomide will receive temozolomide continuously at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² during radiotherapy. DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses adjuvant therapy: Patients randomized to adjuvant temozolomide will start adjuvant temozolomide after a 4 week resting period after the end of radiotherapy. quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy plus adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy temozolomide: Patients randomized to concomitant temozolomide will receive temozolomide continuously at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² during radiotherapy. DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses adjuvant therapy: Patients randomized to adjuvant temozolomide will start adjuvant temozolomide after a 4 week resting period after the end of radiotherapy. quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
Started | 189 | 188 | 186 | 188 |
Completed | 175 | 163 | 109 | 93 |
Not Completed | 14 | 25 | 77 | 95 |
Reason Not Completed | ||||
Lack of Efficacy | 6 | 7 | 49 | 40 |
Adverse Event | 1 | 7 | 14 | 28 |
Death | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Various different reasons/missing | 4 | 8 | 8 | 16 |
Arm/Group Title | RT Alone | RT & Concurrent CT | RT + Adjuvant CT | RT & Concurrent CT + Adjuvant CT | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
radiation therapy alone DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy temozolomide: Patients randomized to concomitant temozolomide will receive temozolomide continuously at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² during radiotherapy. DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Radiotherapy plus adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy temozolomide: Patients randomized to concomitant temozolomide will receive temozolomide continuously at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² during radiotherapy. DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses adjuvant therapy: Patients randomized to adjuvant temozolomide will start adjuvant temozolomide after a 4 week resting period after the end of radiotherapy. quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy plus adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy temozolomide: Patients randomized to concomitant temozolomide will receive temozolomide continuously at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² during radiotherapy. DNA methylation analysis: MGMT methylation status is used for stratification at randomization. laboratory biomarker analysis: Prognostic factor analyses adjuvant therapy: Patients randomized to adjuvant temozolomide will start adjuvant temozolomide after a 4 week resting period after the end of radiotherapy. quality-of-life assessment: Quality of Life analysis will also be used to assess neurological deterioration free progression radiation therapy: Radiotherapy will consist of a conventionally fractionated regimen for 6.5 weeks in a once daily schedule |
Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 189 | 188 | 186 | 188 | 751 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
[Not Specified]
|
|||||
Age, Categorical
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
<=18 years |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
174 92.1%
|
168 89.4%
|
174 93.5%
|
180 95.7%
|
696 92.7%
|
|
>=65 years |
15 7.9%
|
20 10.6%
|
12 6.5%
|
8 4.3%
|
55 7.3%
|
|
Age, Continuous
Median (Full Range) Unit of measure: Years |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
42
(19 to 81.2)
|
43.1
(20.1 to 77.1)
|
40
(20 to 82.3)
|
42.8
(18.3 to 80.1)
|
42.2
(18.3 to 82.3)
|
||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
Female |
75 39.7%
|
68 36.2%
|
82 44.1%
|
82 43.6%
|
307 40.9%
|
|
Male |
114 60.3%
|
120 63.8%
|
104 55.9%
|
106 56.4%
|
444 59.1%
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | |
0 | ||||||
[1]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
||||||
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Canada | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 23 | ||
Netherlands | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
19 | 20 | 19 | 14 | 72 | ||
Belgium | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
19 | 20 | 16 | 18 | 73 | ||
United States | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
30 | 22 | 21 | 28 | 101 | ||
Italy | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
13 | 10 | 16 | 11 | 50 | ||
United Kingdom | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
31 | 39 | 39 | 34 | 143 | ||
Australia | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
14 | 22 | 21 | 25 | 82 | ||
France | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
26 | 23 | 22 | 22 | 93 | ||
Switzerland | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 26 | ||
Germany | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
22 | 13 | 17 | 18 | 70 | ||
Spain | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | ||
Turkey | Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants |
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||
Presence of oligodendroglial elements
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
No |
146 77.2%
|
144 76.6%
|
143 76.9%
|
144 76.6%
|
577 76.8%
|
|
Yes |
43 22.8%
|
44 23.4%
|
43 23.1%
|
44 23.4%
|
174 23.2%
|
|
World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
ECOG performance status 0 (good prognosis) |
111 58.7%
|
110 58.5%
|
108 58.1%
|
112 59.6%
|
441 58.7%
|
|
ECOG performance status >0 (poorer prognosis) |
78 41.3%
|
78 41.5%
|
78 41.9%
|
76 40.4%
|
310 41.3%
|
|
Procedure for pathology and genetic testing
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
by local site laboratory assessment |
70 37.0%
|
70 37.2%
|
68 36.6%
|
54 28.7%
|
262 34.9%
|
|
by central laboratory assessment |
119 63.0%
|
118 62.8%
|
116 62.4%
|
134 71.3%
|
487 64.8%
|
|
Unknown |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
2 1.1%
|
0 0.0%
|
2 0.3%
|
|
Presence of 1p LOH
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
No loss |
175 92.6%
|
176 93.6%
|
172 92.5%
|
175 93.1%
|
698 92.9%
|
|
Loss |
14 7.4%
|
12 6.4%
|
14 7.5%
|
13 6.9%
|
53 7.1%
|
|
MGMT Methylation status
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 189 participants | 188 participants | 186 participants | 188 participants | 751 participants | |
Methylated |
62 32.8%
|
55 29.3%
|
66 35.5%
|
56 29.8%
|
239 31.8%
|
|
Unmethylated |
83 43.9%
|
79 42.0%
|
78 41.9%
|
87 46.3%
|
327 43.5%
|
|
Undetermined/invalid |
44 23.3%
|
54 28.7%
|
42 22.6%
|
45 23.9%
|
185 24.6%
|
Name/Title: | Dr. Thierry Gorlia |
Organization: | EORTC |
Phone: | 027741652 |
EMail: | thierry.gorlia@eortc.org |
Responsible Party: | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00626990 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
EORTC-26053-22054 NCIC CTG CEC.1 ( Other Identifier: NCI-C ) RTOG-0834 ( Other Identifier: RTOG ) 2006-001533-17 ( EudraCT Number ) P04839 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: Merck ) MRC BR14 ( Other Identifier: MRC CTU ) |
First Submitted: | February 28, 2008 |
First Posted: | February 29, 2008 |
Results First Submitted: | February 14, 2023 |
Results First Posted: | September 11, 2023 |
Last Update Posted: | September 11, 2023 |