Weekly Paclitaxel With or Without Pazopanib in Platinum Resistant or Refractory Ovarian Cancer (MITO-11)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01644825

Recruitment Status : Completed

First Posted : July 19, 2012

Last Update Posted : April 9, 2018

View this study on the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

National Cancer Institute, Naples

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruitment Status :	Completed
Actual Primary Completion Date :	May 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :	December 29, 2015

Publications:

Pignata S, Lorusso D, Scambia G, Sambataro D, Tamberi S, Cinieri S, Mosconi AM, Orditura M, Brandes AA, Arcangeli V, Panici PB, Pisano C, Cecere SC, Di Napoli M, Raspagliesi F, Maltese G, Salutari V, Ricci C, Daniele G, Piccirillo MC, Di Maio M, Gallo C, Perrone F; MITO 11 investigators. Pazopanib plus weekly paclitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel alone for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer (MITO 11): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70115-4. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

To Top