Safety and Efficacy Study of mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy and 5-FU/LV + Panitumumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Chemotherapy-naïve Unresectable Advanced Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma (SAPPHIRE)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02337946 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : January 14, 2015
Results First Posted : March 1, 2019
Last Update Posted : September 10, 2019
|
Sponsor:
Takeda
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Takeda
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: None (Open Label); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Colorectal Carcinoma |
Intervention |
Drug: oxaliplatin (OXA), levofolinate calcium (l-LV), 5-FU, panitumumab |
Enrollment | 164 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants took part in the study at 72 investigative sites in Japan from 16 October 2014 to 31 March 2017 (as Primary Completion Date). After that, overall study completion of this study was occurred on 31 August 2017. |
Pre-assignment Details | Participants with a diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma were enrolled to receive protocol treatment (1) up to cycle 6 followed by randomization, received 1 out of 2 treatments from protocol treatment (2) group A and group B. |
Arm/Group Title | Protocol Treatment 1 | Protocol Treatment Period 2: Group A | Protocol Treatment Period 2: Group B |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1. | Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance. | Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance. |
Period Title: Protocol Treatment 1 Period | |||
Started | 164 | 0 | 0 |
Completed | 114 | 0 | 0 |
Not Completed | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Reason Not Completed | |||
Adverse Event | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Major Protocol Deviation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Voluntary Withdrawal | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Lack of Efficacy | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Death During Protocol Treatment | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Surgery Aimed at Curative Resection | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Did not Meet Entrance Criteria | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reason not specified | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: In-between Period | |||
Started | 114 | 0 | 0 |
Completed | 113 | 0 | 0 |
Not Completed | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reason Not Completed | |||
Without Informed Consent | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Protocol Treatment 2 Period | |||
Started | 0 | 56 | 57 |
Safety Population | 0 | 56 | 54 |
Completed | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Not Completed | 0 | 51 | 50 |
Reason Not Completed | |||
Adverse Event | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Voluntary Withdrawal | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 29 | 29 |
Death During Protocol Treatment | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Surgery Aimed at Curative Resection | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Reason not specified | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Entire Study Population | |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who received Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by either Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance or Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance. | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 164 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
Enrolled participants included all participants who were enrolled and received protocol treatment 1.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
66.6 (10.3) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Female |
55 33.5%
|
|
Male |
109 66.5%
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 0 participants | |
[1]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
||
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Japan | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
164 | ||
Histological Type of Adenocarcinoma
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Well differentiated adenocarcinoma |
47 28.7%
|
|
Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma |
91 55.5%
|
|
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma |
15 9.1%
|
|
Mucinous adenocarcinoma |
3 1.8%
|
|
Other |
8 4.9%
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Single, Multiple or Unknown
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Single |
120 73.2%
|
|
Multiple |
4 2.4%
|
|
Unknown |
40 24.4%
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Cecum | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
8 6.5%
|
||
Ascending colon | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
15 12.1%
|
||
Transverse colon | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
10 8.1%
|
||
Descending colon | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
4 3.2%
|
||
Sigmoid colon | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
43 34.7%
|
||
Rectosigmoid | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
12 9.7%
|
||
Rectum | Number Analyzed | 124 participants |
42 33.9%
|
||
[1]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
||
History of Surgery
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Had No History of Surgery |
51 31.1%
|
|
Had History of Surgery |
113 68.9%
|
|
History of Radiotherapy
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Had No History of Radiotherapy |
163 99.4%
|
|
Had History of Radiotherapy |
1 0.6%
|
|
History of Preoperative and/or Postoperative Adjuvant (Adj) Chemotherapy (CT)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Had No History of Pre/Postoperative Adj CT |
151 92.1%
|
|
Had History of Pre/Postoperative Adj CT |
13 7.9%
|
|
Number of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
0 |
3 1.8%
|
|
1 |
72 43.9%
|
|
≥2 |
89 54.3%
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Liver | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
119 72.6%
|
||
Lung | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
57 34.8%
|
||
Peritoneum | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
28 17.1%
|
||
Lymph node | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
60 36.6%
|
||
Bone | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
9 5.5%
|
||
Adrenal gland | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
2 1.2%
|
||
Other | Number Analyzed | 164 participants |
13 7.9%
|
||
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) [Cycle 1]
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
0 |
122 74.4%
|
|
1 |
42 25.6%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description: ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50 percent of waking hours), capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50 percent of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair.
|
||
Neuroblastoma Rat Sarcoma (NRAS) + Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) Testing
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Mutant-type |
10 6.1%
|
|
Wild Type (WT) |
152 92.7%
|
|
Unknown |
2 1.2%
|
|
Worst Grade of Laboratory Tests/Clinical Findings During Protocol Treatment 1
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
None |
103 62.8%
|
|
Grade 2 |
21 12.8%
|
|
Grade ≥3 |
40 24.4%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description: Grade of Laboratory Tests/Clinical Findings was evaluated based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.03 as follows: Grade 1 (mild); Grade 2 (moderate); Grade 3 (severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening); Grade 4 (life-threatening consequences); Grade 5 (death related to Adverse Events (AE)).
|
||
Worst Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy During Protocol Treatment 1
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
None |
100 61.0%
|
|
Grade 1 |
51 31.1%
|
|
Grade 2 |
12 7.3%
|
|
Grade ≥3 |
1 0.6%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description: Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy was evaluated based on NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as follows: Grade 1 (mild); Grade 2 (moderate); Grade 3 (severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening); Grade 4 (life-threatening consequences); Grade 5 (death related to AE).
|
||
Number of Participants without Curative Resection During Protocol Treatment 1
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
164 100.0%
|
||
Treatment Status for Protocol Treatment 1: Reduced or Not Reduced
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Reduced |
59 36.0%
|
|
Not Reduced |
105 64.0%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description: Treatment status was defined based on a presence or absence of any dose reduction.
|
||
Treatment Status for Protocol Treatment 1: Postponed or Not Postponed
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | |
Postponed |
121 73.8%
|
|
Not Postponed |
43 26.2%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description: Treatment status was defined based on a presence or absence of any dose delays.
|
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events
Limitations and Caveats
[Not Specified]
More Information
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts
the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title: | Medical Director |
Organization: | Takeda |
Phone: | +1-877-825-3327 |
EMail: | trialdisclosures@takeda.com |
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: | Takeda |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02337946 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
Panitumumab-2003 U1111-1161-8871 ( Registry Identifier: UTN (WHO) ) 183/NRP-005 ( Other Identifier: Secondary Takeda ID ) JapicCTI-142668 ( Registry Identifier: JapicCTI ) |
First Submitted: | September 30, 2014 |
First Posted: | January 14, 2015 |
Results First Submitted: | March 27, 2018 |
Results First Posted: | March 1, 2019 |
Last Update Posted: | September 10, 2019 |