Lower or Standard Dose Regorafenib in Treating Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02368886 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : February 23, 2015
Results First Posted : July 26, 2019
Last Update Posted : July 27, 2023
|
Sponsor:
Academic and Community Cancer Research United
Collaborator:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Academic and Community Cancer Research United
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: None (Open Label); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Conditions |
Colon Adenocarcinoma Rectal Adenocarcinoma Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 |
Interventions |
Drug: Clobetasol Propionate Other: Pharmacological Study Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment Drug: Regorafenib |
Enrollment | 123 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
Pre-assignment Details |
Arm/Group Title | Arm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy) | Arm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy) | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
Started | 29 | 27 | 34 | 33 |
Completed | 28 | 26 | 33 | 29 |
Not Completed | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Reason Not Completed | ||||
Cancel | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Ineligible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Arm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy) | Arm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy) | Arm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy) | Arm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy) | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). | In the regorafenib dose escalation group, the starting dose of regorafenib was 80 mg/day in week 1, 120 mg/day in week 2, and 160 mg/day in week 3 for cycle 1. Weekly incremental dose-escalation occurred if no significant drug-related toxicities (SDRTs) were observed. In cycle 2, patients received the highest tolerated dose from cycle 1. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials.Patients also received prophylactic 0.05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles starting at cycle 1 day 1 for prevention of HFSR (pre-emptive strategy). | In the regorafenib standard dose group, the regorafenib dose schedule of 160 mg/day started on day 1 and continued for 21 every 28 days. The dose of 160 mg as the standard dose was used since it is the approved and most commonly used dose/schedule in clinical practice based on the results of randomized trials. Patients also had the clobetasol cream applied when HFSR developed (reactive strategy). | Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 28 | 26 | 33 | 29 | 116 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)).
|
|||||
Age, Continuous
Median (Full Range) Unit of measure: Years |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 28 participants | 26 participants | 33 participants | 29 participants | 116 participants | |
65
(38 to 77)
|
57
(29 to 76)
|
61
(32 to 78)
|
62
(34 to 81)
|
61
(29 to 81)
|
||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 28 participants | 26 participants | 33 participants | 29 participants | 116 participants | |
Female |
9 32.1%
|
9 34.6%
|
17 51.5%
|
10 34.5%
|
45 38.8%
|
|
Male |
19 67.9%
|
17 65.4%
|
16 48.5%
|
19 65.5%
|
71 61.2%
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 28 participants | 26 participants | 33 participants | 29 participants | 116 participants | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0 0.0%
|
1 3.8%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.9%
|
|
Asian |
2 7.1%
|
1 3.8%
|
1 3.0%
|
1 3.4%
|
5 4.3%
|
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Black or African American |
1 3.6%
|
4 15.4%
|
0 0.0%
|
4 13.8%
|
9 7.8%
|
|
White |
25 89.3%
|
19 73.1%
|
31 93.9%
|
24 82.8%
|
99 85.3%
|
|
More than one race |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 3.8%
|
1 3.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
2 1.7%
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
United States | Number Analyzed | 28 participants | 26 participants | 33 participants | 29 participants | 116 participants |
28 100.0%
|
26 100.0%
|
33 100.0%
|
29 100.0%
|
116 100.0%
|
||
ECOG Performance Status
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||||
Number Analyzed | 28 participants | 26 participants | 33 participants | 29 participants | 116 participants | |
0 |
9 32.1%
|
11 42.3%
|
15 45.5%
|
8 27.6%
|
43 37.1%
|
|
1 |
19 67.9%
|
15 57.7%
|
18 54.5%
|
21 72.4%
|
73 62.9%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS Scale: 0)Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1)Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2)Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3)Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4)Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair.
|
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events
Limitations and Caveats
[Not Specified]
More Information
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title: | Tanios Bekaii-Saab, M.D. |
Organization: | Mayo Clinic Arizona |
Phone: | 507/266-0800 |
EMail: | Bekaii-Saab.Tanios@mayo.edu |
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: | Academic and Community Cancer Research United |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02368886 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
RU021407I NCI-2015-00011 ( Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) ) RU021407I ( Other Identifier: Academic and Community Cancer Research United ) P30CA015083 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Submitted: | February 16, 2015 |
First Posted: | February 23, 2015 |
Results First Submitted: | June 6, 2019 |
Results First Posted: | July 26, 2019 |
Last Update Posted: | July 27, 2023 |