A Safety and Efficacy Study of Abicipar Pegol in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (CEDAR)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02462928 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : June 4, 2015
Results First Posted : July 28, 2020
Last Update Posted : July 28, 2020
|
Sponsor:
Allergan
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Allergan
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Macular Degeneration |
Interventions |
Drug: Abicipar Pegol Drug: Ranibizumab Other: Sham Procedure |
Enrollment | 939 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
Pre-assignment Details |
Arm/Group Title | Abicipar Pegol 2 mg (2Q8) | Abicipar Pegol 2 mg (2Q12) | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (rQ4) |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Abicipar pegol 2 mg was administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection on Day 1, Week 4, Week 8 and every 8 weeks (2Q8) thereafter through Week 96. Scheduled visits occurred every 4 weeks. To maintain masking, sham was administered to the study eye at scheduled visits where abicipar was not administered. | Abicipar pegol 2 mg was administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection on Day 1, Week 4, Week 12, and every 12 weeks (2Q12) thereafter through week 96. Scheduled visits occurred every 4 weeks. To maintain masking, sham was administered to the study eye at scheduled visits where abicipar was not administered. | Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) 0.5 mg was administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks (rQ4) from Day 1 through Week 96. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
Started | 314 | 313 | 312 |
Completed | 224 | 221 | 255 |
Not Completed | 90 | 92 | 57 |
Reason Not Completed | |||
Screen Failure:Missed Exclusion Criteria | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Adverse Event | 47 | 51 | 25 |
Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 8 | 3 |
Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 4 | 1 |
Withdrawal by Patient | 31 | 21 | 21 |
Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Reason not Specified | 4 | 6 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Abicipar Pegol 2 mg (2Q8) | Abicipar Pegol 2 mg (2Q12) | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (rQ4) | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Abicipar pegol 2 mg was administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection on Day 1, Week 4, Week 8 and every 8 weeks (2Q8) thereafter through Week 96. Scheduled visits occurred every 4 weeks. To maintain masking, sham was administered to the study eye at scheduled visits where abicipar was not administered. | Abicipar pegol 2 mg was administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection on Day 1, Week 4, Week 12, and every 12 weeks (2Q12) thereafter through week 96. Scheduled visits occurred every 4 weeks. To maintain masking, sham was administered to the study eye at scheduled visits where abicipar was not administered. | Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) 0.5 mg was administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks (rQ4) from Day 1 through Week 96. | Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 314 | 313 | 312 | 939 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
|
||||
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 314 participants | 313 participants | 312 participants | 939 participants | |
75.5 (8.4) | 76.9 (8.0) | 77.1 (8.4) | 76.5 (8.3) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 314 participants | 313 participants | 312 participants | 939 participants | |
Female |
162 51.6%
|
183 58.5%
|
169 54.2%
|
514 54.7%
|
|
Male |
152 48.4%
|
130 41.5%
|
143 45.8%
|
425 45.3%
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 314 participants | 313 participants | 312 participants | 939 participants | |
White |
249 79.3%
|
248 79.2%
|
243 77.9%
|
740 78.8%
|
|
Black |
2 0.6%
|
1 0.3%
|
1 0.3%
|
4 0.4%
|
|
Asian |
49 15.6%
|
44 14.1%
|
45 14.4%
|
138 14.7%
|
|
Hispanic |
12 3.8%
|
12 3.8%
|
11 3.5%
|
35 3.7%
|
|
Not Reported |
2 0.6%
|
8 2.6%
|
12 3.8%
|
22 2.3%
|
|
Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Per Per-protocol Population
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Letters |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 265 participants | 262 participants | 290 participants | 817 participants | |
56.7 (13.3) | 56.3 (13.1) | 56.5 (12.6) | 56.5 (13.0) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: BCVA was measured using eye chart and reported as number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in study eye. Lower number of letters read correctly on eye chart, worse the vision (or visual acuity). Study eye is defined as eye that meets entry criteria. If both eyes met entry criteria, eye with worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else right eye was selected as study eye.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: The per-protocol (PP) population included all randomized and treated participants without any protocol deviations that impacted the primary efficacy variable and with treatment compliance to represent the intended regimen adequately.
|
|||||
BCVA Per ITT Population
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Letters |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 313 participants | 313 participants | 312 participants | 938 participants | |
56.4 (13.4) | 56.5 (12.9) | 56.5 (12.5) | 56.5 (12.9) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: BCVA was measured using eye chart and reported as number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in study eye. Lower number of letters read correctly on eye chart, worse the vision (or visual acuity). Study eye is defined as eye that meets entry criteria. If both eyes met entry criteria, eye with worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else right eye was selected as study eye.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at Baseline.
|
|||||
Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Microns |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 313 participants | 313 participants | 312 participants | 938 participants | |
384.7 (142.7) | 378.4 (119.1) | 378.2 (120.5) | 380.4 (127.8) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: CRT was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at Baseline.
|
|||||
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)
[1] [2] Mean (Full Range) Unit of measure: Score on a scale |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 313 participants | 313 participants | 311 participants | 937 participants | |
78.7
(28 to 98)
|
77.3
(34 to 98)
|
77.1
(23 to 100)
|
77.7
(23 to 100)
|
||
[1]
Measure Description: NEI-VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision-targeted questions that represent 11 vision-related quality of life subscales and one general health item. Responses of individual participants were recorded as scores that ranged between 0 (worst) to 100 (best vision related function) with higher scale indicating better vision related function. The overall composite score is then calculated by averaging over all 11 vision-targeted subscale scores, excluding the general health score. Overall composite score was calculated based on mean of non-missing subscales.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at Baseline.
|
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events
Limitations and Caveats
[Not Specified]
More Information
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts
the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title: | Therapeutic Area Head |
Organization: | Allergan |
Phone: | 714-246-4500 |
EMail: | IR-CTRegistration@allergan.com |
Responsible Party: | Allergan |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02462928 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
150998-005 2014-004579-22 ( EudraCT Number ) CEDAR ( Other Identifier: Allergan ) |
First Submitted: | June 2, 2015 |
First Posted: | June 4, 2015 |
Results First Submitted: | July 16, 2020 |
Results First Posted: | July 28, 2020 |
Last Update Posted: | July 28, 2020 |