SBRT Plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib for Pancreatic Cancer
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02704156 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : March 9, 2016
Results First Posted : February 16, 2021
Last Update Posted : May 13, 2022
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: None (Open Label); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Pancreatic Cancer |
Interventions |
Device: Cyberknife plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib Device: Cyberknife plus Gemcitabine |
Enrollment | 170 |
Recruitment Details | Recruitment date was from October 2016 to October 2017. Patients were enrolled in our center. |
Pre-assignment Details |
Arm/Group Title | SBRT Plus Gemcitabine | SBRT Plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
Patients with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer were randomly allocated to SBRT plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib or SBRT plus Gemcitabine. Cyberknife plus Gemcitabine: Radiation therapy plus drug |
Patients with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer were randomly allocated to SBRT plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib or SBRT plus Gemcitabine. Cyberknife plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib: Radiation therapy plus drug |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
Started | 85 | 85 |
Completed | 85 | 85 |
Not Completed | 0 | 0 |
Arm/Group Title | SBRT Plus Gemcitabine | SBRT Plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
Patients with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer were randomly allocated to SBRT plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib or SBRT plus Gemcitabine. Cyberknife plus Gemcitabine: Radiation therapy plus drug |
Patients with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer were randomly allocated to SBRT plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib or SBRT plus Gemcitabine. Cyberknife plus Pembrolizumab and Trametinib: Radiation therapy plus drug |
Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 85 | 85 | 170 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
[Not Specified]
|
|||
Age, Continuous
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) Unit of measure: Years |
||||
Number Analyzed | 85 participants | 85 participants | 170 participants | |
66
(58 to 73)
|
65
(54 to 74)
|
65
(57 to 74)
|
||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 85 participants | 85 participants | 170 participants | |
Female |
33 38.8%
|
32 37.6%
|
65 38.2%
|
|
Male |
52 61.2%
|
53 62.4%
|
105 61.8%
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 85 participants | 85 participants | 170 participants | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Asian |
85 100.0%
|
85 100.0%
|
170 100.0%
|
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Black or African American |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
White |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
More than one race |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
China | Number Analyzed | 85 participants | 85 participants | 170 participants |
85 | 85 | 170 | ||
PD-L1 intensity
[1] Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 85 participants | 85 participants | 170 participants |
IC1 or TC1 | 56 | 60 | 116 | |
IC2 or TC2 | 23 | 20 | 43 | |
IC3 or TC3 | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
[1]
Measure Description: PD-L1 tumor cell (TC) expression was scored as the percentage of PD-L1 TC, which was stratified as TC3 ≥ 50% or TC2 ≥ 5% but < 50% or TC1 ≥ 1% but <5%. PD-L1 tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) expression was scored as the percentage of tumor area stained positive, which was classified as IC3 ≥ 10% or IC2 ≥ 5% but < 10% or IC1 ≥ 1% but <5%. Briefly, the higher expression of TCor IC indicated worse outcomes.
|
Name/Title: | Huojun Zhang |
Organization: | Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University |
Phone: | 86-021-31162207 |
EMail: | chyyzhj@163.com |
Responsible Party: | Zhang Huo Jun, Changhai Hospital |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02704156 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
ChanghaiHosp |
First Submitted: | March 1, 2016 |
First Posted: | March 9, 2016 |
Results First Submitted: | January 6, 2021 |
Results First Posted: | February 16, 2021 |
Last Update Posted: | May 13, 2022 |