Closed-loop Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Refractory Neuropathic Pain
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03029884 |
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : January 24, 2017
Results First Posted : November 22, 2023
Last Update Posted : November 22, 2023
|
Sponsor:
Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD
Collaborators:
United States Department of Defense
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment; Masking: Single (Participant); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Conditions |
Chronic Pain Post Stroke Pain Phantom Limb Pain Spinal Cord Injuries |
Interventions |
Device: Open-Loop DBS Device: Sham Stimulation Device: Closed-Loop DBS |
Enrollment | 4 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Recruitment was done through the UCSF Pain management clinic and online from clinicaltrials.gov from October 2017 to December 2019 |
Pre-assignment Details | There was a 6 month run-in period for collection of personalized neural signals before stimulation began |
Arm/Group Title | Open vs Closed Loop vs Sham DBS |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Chronic brain recording and stimulation with unilateral or bilateral implantation in pain-related brain regions. Both thalamic pain syndrome and phantom pain participants will participate in active DBS, blinded to the participant. Open-loop DBS refers to tonic stimulation of ACC or OFC regions without feedback control. Closed loop is feedback enabled stimulation triggered by pain biomarkers. Sham is no stimulation. Because >6 sequences were used, only 1 arm/group is defined as per instructions. |
Period Title: Inactive DBS Run in Period (6 Months) | |
Started | 4 |
Completed | 4 |
Not Completed | 0 |
Period Title: Open-Loop DBS (6 Weeks) | |
Started | 4 |
Completed | 4 |
Not Completed | 0 |
Period Title: Closed-Loop DBS (6 Weeks) | |
Started | 4 |
Completed | 4 |
Not Completed | 0 |
Period Title: Sham DBS (3 Weeks) | |
Started | 4 |
Completed | 4 |
Not Completed | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | All Study Participants | |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
Chronic brain recording and stimulation with unilateral or bilateral implantation in pain-related brain regions. Both thalamic pain syndrome and phantom pain participants will participate in active DBS, blinded to the participant. Medtronic Activa PC+S: In Aim 2 we will perform closed loop DBS versus sham (randomized) to evaluate efficacy of stimulation for analgesia. In Aim 3, closed-loop DBS will be compared to open-loop DBS in a patient blinded, randomized fashion. |
|
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 4 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
Chronic neuropathic pain with post stroke pain (3) or phantom limb pain (1)
|
|
Age, Categorical
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 4 participants | |
<=18 years |
0 0.0%
|
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
4 100.0%
|
|
>=65 years |
0 0.0%
|
|
Age, Continuous
Mean (Full Range) Unit of measure: Years |
||
Number Analyzed | 4 participants | |
59
(56 to 63)
|
||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 4 participants | |
Female |
2 50.0%
|
|
Male |
2 50.0%
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||
Number Analyzed | 4 participants | |
Hispanic or Latino |
0 0.0%
|
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
4 100.0%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
||
United States | Number Analyzed | 4 participants |
4 | ||
Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Score
[1] Mean (Full Range) Unit of measure: Units on a scale |
||
Number Analyzed | 4 participants | |
7.95
(5 to 10)
|
||
[1]
Measure Description: Numerical Rating Score (NRS) ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher values indicate worse pain (worse outcome).
|
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events
Limitations and Caveats
[Not Specified]
More Information
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title: | Prasad Shirvalkar MD, PhD - Principal Investigator |
Organization: | University of California, San Francisco |
Phone: | 415-885-7246 |
EMail: | Prasad.Shirvalkar@ucsf.edu |
Responsible Party: | Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03029884 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
16-18617 UH3NS109556 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Submitted: | January 6, 2017 |
First Posted: | January 24, 2017 |
Results First Submitted: | June 9, 2023 |
Results First Posted: | November 22, 2023 |
Last Update Posted: | November 22, 2023 |