MUK Nine b: OPTIMUM Treatment Protocol (MUKnineb)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03188172

Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting

First Posted : June 15, 2017

Last Update Posted : May 14, 2024

View this study on the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov

Sponsor:

Collaborators:

Myeloma UK

Celgene

Janssen, LP

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

University of Leeds

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruitment Status :	Active, not recruiting
Estimated Primary Completion Date :	October 1, 2025
Estimated Study Completion Date :	May 31, 2026

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Rata M, Blackledge M, Scurr E, Winfield J, Koh DM, Dragan A, Candito A, King A, Rennie W, Gaba S, Suresh P, Malcolm P, Davis A, Nilak A, Shah A, Gandhi S, Albrizio M, Drury A, Roberts S, Jenner M, Brown S, Kaiser M, Messiou C. Implementation of Whole-Body MRI (MY-RADS) within the OPTIMUM/MUKnine multi-centre clinical trial for patients with myeloma. Insights Imaging. 2022 Jul 28;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01253-0.

Oliva S, Kaiser MF. Is it time to tailor treatment on the basis of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma? Lancet Haematol. 2021 Dec;8(12):e876-e877. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00341-0. No abstract available.

Pawlyn C. High-risk myeloma: a challenge to define and to determine the optimal treatment. Lancet Haematol. 2021 Jan;8(1):e4-e6. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30361-6. Epub 2020 Dec 22. No abstract available.

To Top