The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of Atezolizumab Compared With a Single-Agent Chemotherapy in Treatment Naïve Participants With Locally Advanced or Recurrent or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Deemed Unsuitable For Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy (IPSOS)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03191786
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 19, 2017
Results First Posted : May 17, 2023
Last Update Posted : November 7, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study Type Interventional
Study Design Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: None (Open Label);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody
Drug: Vinorelbine
Drug: Gemcitabine
Enrollment 453
Recruitment Details  
Pre-assignment Details  
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death. Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Period Title: Overall Study
Started 302 151
Completed 15 0
Not Completed 287 151
Reason Not Completed
Death             236             127
Lost to Follow-up             9             3
Physician Decision             1             0
Study Terminated By Sponsor             15             5
Withdrawal by Subject             26             16
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine) Total
Hide Arm/Group Description Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death. Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Number of Baseline Participants 302 151 453
Hide Baseline Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Age, Continuous  
Mean (Standard Deviation)
Unit of measure:  Years
Number Analyzed 302 participants 151 participants 453 participants
73.6  (9.1) 73.8  (8.5) 73.7  (8.9)
Sex: Female, Male  
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure:  Participants
Number Analyzed 302 participants 151 participants 453 participants
Female
82
  27.2%
43
  28.5%
125
  27.6%
Male
220
  72.8%
108
  71.5%
328
  72.4%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)  
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure:  Participants
Number Analyzed 302 participants 151 participants 453 participants
Hispanic or Latino
47
  15.6%
23
  15.2%
70
  15.5%
Not Hispanic or Latino
242
  80.1%
125
  82.8%
367
  81.0%
Unknown or Not Reported
13
   4.3%
3
   2.0%
16
   3.5%
Race (NIH/OMB)  
Measure Type: Count of Participants
Unit of measure:  Participants
Number Analyzed 302 participants 151 participants 453 participants
American Indian or Alaska Native
12
   4.0%
9
   6.0%
21
   4.6%
Asian
75
  24.8%
38
  25.2%
113
  24.9%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
   0.0%
0
   0.0%
0
   0.0%
Black or African American
2
   0.7%
1
   0.7%
3
   0.7%
White
203
  67.2%
95
  62.9%
298
  65.8%
More than one race
6
   2.0%
6
   4.0%
12
   2.6%
Unknown or Not Reported
4
   1.3%
2
   1.3%
6
   1.3%
1.Primary Outcome
Title Overall Survival (OS)
Hide Description Overall survival is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.
Time Frame From randomization up to death from any cause (up to approximately 55 months)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
10.3
(9.4 to 11.9)
9.2
(5.9 to 11.2)
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments [Not Specified]
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.028
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.78
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.63 to 0.97
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
2.Secondary Outcome
Title OS Rates at the 6, 12, 18, 24-Months Timepoints
Hide Description OS rate at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were estimated for each treatment arm.
Time Frame 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Measure Type: Number
Number (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Percentage
6 Months
64.0
(58.6 to 69.5)
57.5
(49.4 to 65.7)
12 Months
43.7
(37.9 to 49.4)
38.6
(30.5 to 46.7)
18 Months
31.4
(26.0 to 36.8)
24.0
(16.8 to 31.2)
24 Months
24.3
(19.3 to 29.4)
12.4
(6.7 to 18.0)
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments OS Rate at 6 Months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in OS Rates
Estimated Value 6.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.3 to 16.3
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments OS Rate at 12 Months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in OS Rates
Estimated Value 5.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.9 to 15.0
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments OS Rate at 18 Months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in OS Rates
Estimated Value 7.4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.6 to 16.5
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments OS Rate at 24 Months
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in OS Rates
Estimated Value 11.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
4.4 to 19.5
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
3.Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate, as Determined by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1)
Hide Description Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as a Best Overall Response (BOR) of either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as determined by the investigator with use of RECIST v1.1. A minimum interval of 6 weeks (42 days) will be considered for Stable Disease (SD) to be assigned as best overall response, i.e. in the case the single response is SD, PR or CR, this single response must have been assessed no less than 6 weeks (at least 42 days) after start date of study treatment.
Time Frame From randomization to the first occurence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 55 months)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Measure Type: Number
Number (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants
16.9
(12.8 to 21.6)
7.9
(4.2 to 13.5)
4.Secondary Outcome
Title Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Hide Description PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time Frame From randomization to the first occurence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 55 months)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
4.2
(3.7 to 5.5)
4.0
(2.9 to 5.4)
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments [Not Specified]
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.182
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.70 to 1.07
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
5.Secondary Outcome
Title Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Hide Description DOR is defined as the time from the first tumor assessment that supports the participants' objective response (CR or PR, whichever is first reported) to documented disease progression as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, among patients who have a best overall response as CR or PR.
Time Frame Time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 55 months)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 51 12
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
14.0
(8.1 to 20.3)
7.8
(4.8 to 9.7)
6.Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants With At Lease One Adverse Event
Hide Description Percentage of participants with at least one adverse event.
Time Frame From randomization up to approximately 55 months
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Safety-Evaluable Population is defined as all randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 300 147
Measure Type: Number
Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants
91.7 97.3
7.Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Score
Hide Description EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated and reliable self-report measure that consists of 30 questions that assess five aspects of patient functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain), global health/quality of life, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). EORTC QLQ-C30 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life); however a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by participants as clinically significant (Osoba et al. 1998).
Time Frame Baseline, Day 1 of each treatment cycle up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 55 months) (Cycle length = 21 days)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Mean (Standard Deviation)
Unit of Measure: units of a scale
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Baseline Number Analyzed 291 participants 146 participants
54.70  (22.00) 55.25  (21.06)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 6 Number Analyzed 219 participants 115 participants
2.09  (24.11) 0.29  (22.94)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 63 participants
2.76  (23.42) 1.85  (19.94)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 40 participants
4.20  (24.27) -0.42  (19.52)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 29 participants
4.92  (23.90) -1.72  (18.82)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 22 participants
4.32  (21.12) 2.65  (13.70)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 16 participants
8.20  (23.55) -0.52  (22.25)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
6.17  (24.98) 1.19  (19.02)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
6.44  (27.37) 4.86  (15.67)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
8.56  (20.46) 8.33  (12.60)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
6.82  (19.15) 5.00  (17.28)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
3.85  (21.11) 2.08  (24.88)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
11.40  (20.07) -2.78  (12.73)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
2.08  (24.61) -12.50  (5.89)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
4.69  (18.50) -25.00 [1]   (NA)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
1.79  (21.73)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (20.52)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.98  (19.78)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
1.19  (25.91)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.17  (18.42)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (17.82)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-3.13  (23.54)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (17.82)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-6.67  (19.00)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-4.17  (20.97)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-16.67 [1]   (NA)
GHS/HRQoL Scale Score, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
-9.85  (24.10) 3.85  (20.30)
Physical Functioning, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 146 participants
61.34  (25.66) 61.97  (23.75)
Physical Functioning, Week 6 Number Analyzed 221 participants 115 participants
-2.93  (17.69) -1.07  (18.49)
Physical Functioning, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
0.17  (20.35) 1.46  (18.07)
Physical Functioning, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 39 participants
3.02  (17.97) -1.58  (18.00)
Physical Functioning, Week 24 Number Analyzed 107 participants 30 participants
3.49  (18.66) -5.50  (15.64)
Physical Functioning, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
4.25  (18.22) -1.23  (21.80)
Physical Functioning, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
6.98  (19.68) -4.90  (28.33)
Physical Functioning, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
3.58  (24.08) 0.95  (16.92)
Physical Functioning, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
7.44  (18.92) 2.22  (19.76)
Physical Functioning, Week 57 Number Analyzed 36 participants 8 participants
7.59  (16.73) -3.33  (20.47)
Physical Functioning, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
4.65  (22.39) 2.67  (17.38)
Physical Functioning, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
4.87  (27.88) -1.67  (34.16)
Physical Functioning, Week 84 Number Analyzed 18 participants 3 participants
3.70  (23.68) -8.89  (26.94)
Physical Functioning, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
1.67  (23.38) -26.67  (18.86)
Physical Functioning, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
2.40  (16.19) -40.00 [1]   (NA)
Physical Functioning, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (19.67)
Physical Functioning, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
3.33  (20.04)
Physical Functioning, Week 129 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
-1.03  (19.02)
Physical Functioning, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-0.48  (19.47)
Physical Functioning, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-0.48  (17.04)
Physical Functioning, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (10.69)
Physical Functioning, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-3.61  (13.44)
Physical Functioning, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-1.90  (21.33)
Physical Functioning, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
2.67  (19.21)
Physical Functioning, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-3.33  (12.77)
Physical Functioning, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-3.33  (4.71)
Physical Functioning, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-20.00 [1]   (NA)
Physical Functioning, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
-9.70  (25.01) -6.67  (27.08)
Role Functioning, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 145 participants
62.53  (33.17) 61.72  (34.31)
Role Functioning, Week 6 Number Analyzed 222 participants 114 participants
-2.63  (28.13) -3.51  (30.12)
Role Functioning, Week 12 Number Analyzed 150 participants 63 participants
-1.78  (30.48) -1.59  (26.56)
Role Functioning, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 39 participants
-0.96  (30.02) 1.71  (36.63)
Role Functioning, Week 24 Number Analyzed 107 participants 30 participants
1.25  (30.00) -5.00  (28.42)
Role Functioning, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-0.20  (29.10) -7.25  (32.50)
Role Functioning, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 16 participants
2.15  (35.00) -14.58  (47.09)
Role Functioning, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
1.54  (35.95) -4.76  (47.78)
Role Functioning, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
4.92  (29.55) -2.78  (34.69)
Role Functioning, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
3.15  (28.82) -4.17  (19.42)
Role Functioning, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
0.51  (25.17) -6.67  (25.28)
Role Functioning, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-0.64  (31.44) 8.33  (48.11)
Role Functioning, Week 84 Number Analyzed 18 participants 3 participants
3.70  (16.72) -11.11  (19.25)
Role Functioning, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-1.67  (26.98) -25.00  (35.36)
Role Functioning, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
2.08  (18.13) -33.33 [1]   (NA)
Role Functioning, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-3.57  (22.81)
Role Functioning, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-1.19  (19.02)
Role Functioning, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-1.19  (17.86)
Role Functioning, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (22.51)
Role Functioning, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-3.57  (17.52)
Role Functioning, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (6.30)
Role Functioning, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-10.42  (26.63)
Role Functioning, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (26.97)
Role Functioning, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-10.00  (9.13)
Role Functioning, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (13.61)
Role Functioning, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Role Functioning, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Role Functioning, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
-22.73  (41.01) -1.28  (43.28)
Emotional Functioning, Baseline Number Analyzed 290 participants 146 participants
74.20  (23.87) 73.38  (23.55)
Emotional Functioning, Week 6 Number Analyzed 219 participants 115 participants
2.12  (20.59) 0.46  (23.00)
Emotional Functioning, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 64 participants
1.24  (21.06) 4.21  (22.77)
Emotional Functioning, Week 18 Number Analyzed 120 participants 40 participants
3.82  (18.23) 0.28  (22.10)
Emotional Functioning, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 30 participants
4.13  (17.07) 4.07  (17.40)
Emotional Functioning, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
3.15  (17.62) 2.17  (20.29)
Emotional Functioning, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 16 participants
2.02  (16.78) -5.38  (21.31)
Emotional Functioning, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
2.01  (19.08) -7.14  (16.30)
Emotional Functioning, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
5.04  (13.87) -3.47  (10.33)
Emotional Functioning, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
5.78  (20.58) 3.13  (23.12)
Emotional Functioning, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
4.29  (17.81) 6.67  (6.97)
Emotional Functioning, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
0.32  (21.01) 12.50  (28.46)
Emotional Functioning, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
6.58  (17.91) 0.00  (16.97)
Emotional Functioning, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
2.92  (13.59) -4.17  (5.89)
Emotional Functioning, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
4.69  (12.53) -16.67 [1]   (NA)
Emotional Functioning, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
3.57  (15.92)
Emotional Functioning, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
1.79  (10.93)
Emotional Functioning, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.98  (12.91)
Emotional Functioning, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.17  (12.97)
Emotional Functioning, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
5.36  (18.08)
Emotional Functioning, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
2.38  (10.45)
Emotional Functioning, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-1.04  (8.26)
Emotional Functioning, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
2.38  (12.47)
Emotional Functioning, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-1.67  (10.87)
Emotional Functioning, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-2.08  (10.49)
Emotional Functioning, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-4.17  (17.68)
Emotional Functioning, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-16.67 [1]   (NA)
Emotional Functioning, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
6.82  (26.57) -5.77  (21.08)
Cognitive Functioning, Baseline Number Analyzed 291 participants 146 participants
81.39  (21.49) 82.65  (19.95)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 6 Number Analyzed 219 participants 115 participants
-1.67  (21.17) -5.94  (21.76)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
-1.79  (22.52) -2.60  (22.27)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 40 participants
2.62  (19.95) -7.92  (24.46)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 30 participants
0.48  (18.41) -10.00  (28.57)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
-2.01  (18.11) -8.70  (17.31)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 16 participants
-0.54  (15.96) -11.46  (16.91)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-4.94  (23.71) -7.14  (12.60)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-1.89  (16.16) -11.11  (14.79)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-3.15  (20.73) -2.08  (16.52)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-4.04  (23.58) -3.33  (18.26)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-5.13  (17.49) -4.17  (20.97)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-3.51  (18.90) 5.56  (9.62)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
3.33  (12.80) 0.00  (0.00)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
4.17  (16.67) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.76  (16.57)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (20.67)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (13.07)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (20.52)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
1.19  (16.62)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
4.76  (12.60)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
6.25  (12.40)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (9.62)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
3.33  (18.26)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Cognitive Functioning, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Cognitive Functioning, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
-16.67  (23.57) 5.13  (25.81)
Social Functioning, Baseline Number Analyzed 290 participants 146 participants
71.32  (29.12) 74.43  (27.62)
Social Functioning, Week 6 Number Analyzed 218 participants 115 participants
1.30  (27.66) -4.49  (28.30)
Social Functioning, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 64 participants
1.58  (27.93) -4.17  (32.93)
Social Functioning, Week 18 Number Analyzed 119 participants 40 participants
5.60  (24.38) -14.17  (31.93)
Social Functioning, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 30 participants
5.08  (24.91) -11.11  (27.45)
Social Functioning, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
4.82  (23.79) -5.80  (36.10)
Social Functioning, Week 36 Number Analyzed 61 participants 16 participants
3.01  (27.97) -14.58  (42.11)
Social Functioning, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-0.31  (26.79) -7.14  (36.23)
Social Functioning, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
1.89  (21.93) -5.56  (28.72)
Social Functioning, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
3.60  (29.17) 2.08  (30.13)
Social Functioning, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
5.56  (26.90) 3.33  (29.81)
Social Functioning, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
5.77  (23.07) 4.17  (34.36)
Social Functioning, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
2.63  (21.70) 22.22  (25.46)
Social Functioning, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
8.33  (16.67) 8.33  (11.79)
Social Functioning, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
9.38  (17.18) 16.67 [1]   (NA)
Social Functioning, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (18.32)
Social Functioning, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
7.14  (14.19)
Social Functioning, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (30.56)
Social Functioning, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (20.52)
Social Functioning, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
7.14  (16.94)
Social Functioning, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
4.76  (15.85)
Social Functioning, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-6.25  (29.46)
Social Functioning, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
7.14  (26.97)
Social Functioning, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
6.67  (38.37)
Social Functioning, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-4.17  (28.46)
Social Functioning, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-25.00  (35.36)
Social Functioning, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-50.00 [1]   (NA)
Social Functioning, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
1.52  (46.22) -12.82  (34.80)
Fatigue, Baseline Number Analyzed 293 participants 146 participants
41.62  (26.98) 42.62  (25.10)
Fatigue, Week 6 Number Analyzed 221 participants 115 participants
3.37  (23.32) 2.08  (23.71)
Fatigue, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 64 participants
0.53  (26.98) -1.56  (22.99)
Fatigue, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 40 participants
-1.79  (22.11) 2.22  (18.69)
Fatigue, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
-3.14  (25.82) 2.96  (21.43)
Fatigue, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
-2.88  (22.98) -3.38  (24.03)
Fatigue, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
-4.06  (28.12) 4.86  (27.81)
Fatigue, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-2.67  (29.11) 3.17  (28.05)
Fatigue, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
-6.72  (24.86) 1.85  (23.61)
Fatigue, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-3.30  (22.66) 1.39  (18.25)
Fatigue, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-2.53  (29.63) -6.67  (12.67)
Fatigue, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-4.70  (22.26) -8.33  (33.18)
Fatigue, Week 84 Number Analyzed 18 participants 3 participants
-6.79  (26.72) 22.22  (19.25)
Fatigue, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-5.56  (30.05) 22.22  (0.00)
Fatigue, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-5.56  (26.91) 33.33 [1]   (NA)
Fatigue, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-0.79  (33.32)
Fatigue, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (28.30)
Fatigue, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.78  (18.33)
Fatigue, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-1.59  (26.10)
Fatigue, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-3.17  (25.94)
Fatigue, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-1.59  (14.95)
Fatigue, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
1.39  (29.95)
Fatigue, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (20.14)
Fatigue, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
4.44  (26.76)
Fatigue, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
5.56  (14.34)
Fatigue, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-5.56  (7.86)
Fatigue, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-11.11 [1]   (NA)
Fatigue, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
0.00  (31.82) 1.71  (33.59)
Nausea and Vomiting, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 146 participants
8.28  (17.07) 7.99  (15.06)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 6 Number Analyzed 222 participants 115 participants
0.90  (16.98) 1.01  (19.28)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
1.12  (17.72) 3.65  (16.92)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 40 participants
-0.41  (15.67) 3.33  (18.18)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 24 Number Analyzed 107 participants 30 participants
-1.87  (14.54) 3.33  (16.02)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-2.38  (16.39) 3.62  (10.0063)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
2.12  (17.32) 3.13  (15.18)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
1.54  (11.79) 3.57  (19.81)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
-1.55  (15.78) 0.00  (20.10)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
2.25  (11.89) 2.08  (18.77)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-1.01  (14.99) -3.33  (7.45)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
2.56  (9.06) -4.17  (8.33)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
0.88  (8.74) 0.00  (16.67)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-1.67  (5.13) -8.33  (11.79)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-2.08  (5.69) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.76  (12.10)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-1.19  (7.91)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (6.54)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (6.05)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (6.05)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (6.30)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-2.08  (5.89)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (6.30)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-3.33  (7.45)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Nausea and Vomiting, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Nausea and Vomiting, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
13.64  (42.04) 0.00  (33.33)
Pain, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 146 participants
31.52  (29.67) 32.99  (29.06)
Pain, Week 6 Number Analyzed 222 participants 115 participants
-0.98  (25.27) -1.01  (26.61)
Pain, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
-3.58  (29.67) -5.73  (27.09)
Pain, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 40 participants
-5.51  (30.38) 3.75  (31.23)
Pain, Week 24 Number Analyzed 107 participants 30 participants
-6.70  (30.01) 3.89  (23.44)
Pain, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-5.36  (30.30) -9.42  (21.80)
Pain, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
-7.41  (28.36) 3.13  (25.25)
Pain, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-5.25  (33.77) -4.76  (33.61)
Pain, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-9.85  (30.57) -11.11  (26.91)
Pain, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-7.21  (31.80) -6.25  (25.10)
Pain, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-13.13  (30.26) -20.00  (21.73)
Pain, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-5.77  (33.65) 0.00  (36.00)
Pain, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-15.79  (26.34) -11.11  (19.25)
Pain, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-7.50  (27.29) -16.67  (23.57)
Pain, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-17.71  (25.44) -33.33 [1]   (NA)
Pain, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (23.44)
Pain, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-15.48  (26.53)
Pain, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-10.71  (16.80)
Pain, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-15.48  (25.71)
Pain, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-13.10  (27.87)
Pain, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (20.25)
Pain, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-10.42  (19.80)
Pain, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-11.90  (34.31)
Pain, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-13.33  (36.13)
Pain, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-12.50  (25.00)
Pain, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-25.00  (35.36)
Pain, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-16.67 [1]   (NA)
Pain, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
9.09  (26.21) -7.69  (38.26)
Dyspnoea, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 145 participants
36.17  (30.47) 39.31  (31.35)
Dyspnoea, Week 6 Number Analyzed 220 participants 114 participants
-1.36  (28.55) -0.58  (29.74)
Dyspnoea, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
0.45  (30.51) -4.69  (27.13)
Dyspnoea, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 40 participants
-1.91  (26.87) -3.33  (31.85)
Dyspnoea, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
-5.03  (29.02) -4.44  (29.99)
Dyspnoea, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-4.37  (28.24) -8.70  (30.51)
Dyspnoea, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 16 participants
-6.99  (27.08) 0.00  (34.43)
Dyspnoea, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 13 participants
-8.64  (32.50) -7.69  (19.97)
Dyspnoea, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 11 participants
-7.58  (30.38) -3.03  (23.35)
Dyspnoea, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-9.01  (30.07) -12.50  (24.80)
Dyspnoea, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-3.03  (30.46) -20.00  (18.26)
Dyspnoea, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-5.13  (22.49) -16.67  (19.25)
Dyspnoea, Week 84 Number Analyzed 18 participants 3 participants
-9.26  (25.06) 0.00  (0.00)
Dyspnoea, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
0.00  (35.87) -16.67  (23.57)
Dyspnoea, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
4.17  (26.87) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dyspnoea, Week 111 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
-7.69  (33.76)
Dyspnoea, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (22.65)
Dyspnoea, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (24.33)
Dyspnoea, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (27.62)
Dyspnoea, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (22.10)
Dyspnoea, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (19.25)
Dyspnoea, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-4.17  (21.36)
Dyspnoea, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
4.76  (23.00)
Dyspnoea, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
6.67  (27.89)
Dyspnoea, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (27.22)
Dyspnoea, Week 201 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dyspnoea, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dyspnoea, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 12 participants
24.24  (44.95) -2.78  (43.71)
Insomnia, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 146 participants
30.50  (29.97) 31.05  (32.44)
Insomnia, Week 6 Number Analyzed 222 participants 115 participants
-1.95  (31.25) -1.16  (33.60)
Insomnia, Week 12 Number Analyzed 150 participants 64 participants
-1.78  (31.32) -3.65  (33.13)
Insomnia, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 40 participants
-4.37  (27.76) -2.50  (36.51)
Insomnia, Week 24 Number Analyzed 107 participants 30 participants
-6.23  (29.01) -5.56  (31.66)
Insomnia, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-3.17  (26.19) -15.94  (28.19)
Insomnia, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
-3.17  (26.58) -18.75  (34.36)
Insomnia, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-3.09  (36.21) -9.52  (27.51)
Insomnia, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
-6.20  (27.46) 2.78  (26.43)
Insomnia, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-9.91  (32.27) 4.17  (33.03)
Insomnia, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-8.08  (27.68) -6.67  (14.91)
Insomnia, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-8.97  (27.58) -16.67  (19.25)
Insomnia, Week 84 Number Analyzed 18 participants 3 participants
-7.41  (24.40) -22.22  (19.25)
Insomnia, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-8.33  (23.88) 0.00  (0.00)
Insomnia, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-10.42  (20.07) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Insomnia, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (20.37)
Insomnia, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-11.90  (21.11)
Insomnia, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (20.37)
Insomnia, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (21.68)
Insomnia, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (28.39)
Insomnia, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (12.60)
Insomnia, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
0.00  (17.82)
Insomnia, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (16.27)
Insomnia, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-13.33  (38.01)
Insomnia, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-8.33  (16.67)
Insomnia, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-33.33  (47.14)
Insomnia, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-33.33 [1]   (NA)
Insomnia, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
12.12  (42.88) -5.13  (35.61)
Appetite Loss, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 146 participants
31.63  (33.06) 31.05  (32.91)
Appetite Loss, Week 6 Number Analyzed 221 participants 114 participants
1.06  (33.99) 0.00  (38.40)
Appetite Loss, Week 12 Number Analyzed 150 participants 64 participants
-4.22  (35.46) 7.29  (32.24)
Appetite Loss, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 40 participants
-7.38  (33.06) 13.33  (27.01)
Appetite Loss, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
-9.43  (28.27) 10.00  (32.93)
Appetite Loss, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-12.30  (28.24) 7.25  (31.71)
Appetite Loss, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
-11.11  (33.87) 6.25  (30.35)
Appetite Loss, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-7.41  (32.81) 2.38  (27.62)
Appetite Loss, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
-10.85  (29.74) 5.56  (44.57)
Appetite Loss, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-6.31  (31.27) 8.33  (42.72)
Appetite Loss, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-9.09  (29.19) 13.33  (29.81)
Appetite Loss, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-10.26  (30.94) 0.00  (27.22)
Appetite Loss, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-17.54  (28.04) 22.22  (19.25)
Appetite Loss, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-10.00  (26.71) 50.00  (23.57)
Appetite Loss, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-10.42  (20.07) 66.67 [1]   (NA)
Appetite Loss, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (23.31)
Appetite Loss, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (27.51)
Appetite Loss, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (23.31)
Appetite Loss, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (24.21)
Appetite Loss, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (31.35)
Appetite Loss, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Appetite Loss, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Appetite Loss, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (25.20)
Appetite Loss, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-13.33  (29.81)
Appetite Loss, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
8.33  (16.67)
Appetite Loss, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
16.67  (23.57)
Appetite Loss, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Appetite Loss, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
-9.09  (39.70) -7.69  (52.97)
Constipation, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 146 participants
21.20  (30.67) 21.92  (27.80)
Constipation, Week 6 Number Analyzed 221 participants 115 participants
-0.45  (27.98) 1.45  (31.65)
Constipation, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
-2.46  (29.79) -0.52  (28.17)
Constipation, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 40 participants
-6.01  (29.39) 0.83  (29.71)
Constipation, Week 24 Number Analyzed 107 participants 30 participants
-5.61  (29.13) 1.11  (22.29)
Constipation, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-6.75  (27.76) 5.80  (25.92)
Constipation, Week 36 Number Analyzed 63 participants 16 participants
-7.94  (33.18) 6.25  (18.13)
Constipation, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-4.94  (31.33) 0.00  (18.49)
Constipation, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 11 participants
-10.61  (32.76) -6.06  (25.03)
Constipation, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-15.32  (28.97) -8.33  (15.43)
Constipation, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-13.13  (27.56) 0.00  (23.57)
Constipation, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-5.13  (32.24) 16.67  (57.74)
Constipation, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-3.51  (31.22) 11.11  (38.49)
Constipation, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-8.33  (35.66) 33.33  (0.00)
Constipation, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-10.42  (35.94) 33.33 [1]   (NA)
Constipation, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (41.71)
Constipation, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (41.05)
Constipation, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (41.71)
Constipation, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (47.91)
Constipation, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-11.90  (42.58)
Constipation, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (26.23)
Constipation, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-8.33  (29.55)
Constipation, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (26.23)
Constipation, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-13.33  (18.26)
Constipation, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (27.22)
Constipation, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
16.67  (23.57)
Constipation, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Constipation, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
3.03  (45.84) 7.69  (30.89)
Diarrhoea, Baseline Number Analyzed 290 participants 146 participants
5.63  (15.28) 5.71  (16.31)
Diarrhoea, Week 6 Number Analyzed 219 participants 115 participants
-0.61  (19.93) 3.48  (23.93)
Diarrhoea, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 63 participants
1.80  (21.57) 1.06  (18.90)
Diarrhoea, Week 18 Number Analyzed 120 participants 40 participants
-0.83  (18.57) 5.83  (24.91)
Diarrhoea, Week 24 Number Analyzed 104 participants 30 participants
0.00  (18.58) 5.56  (17.69)
Diarrhoea, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
2.01  (19.02) 4.35  (11.48)
Diarrhoea, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 16 participants
0.00  (20.91) 2.08  (8.33)
Diarrhoea, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-3.09  (17.46) 2.38  (8.91)
Diarrhoea, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-0.76  (15.23) 8.33  (20.72)
Diarrhoea, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
0.00  (20.79) 4.17  (11.79)
Diarrhoea, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
-4.04  (18.18) 6.67  (14.91)
Diarrhoea, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
-5.13  (15.47) 0.00  (0.00)
Diarrhoea, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
1.75  (13.49) 0.00  (0.00)
Diarrhoea, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
1.67  (25.31) 0.00  (0.00)
Diarrhoea, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
0.00  (17.21) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Diarrhoea, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
7.14  (29.75)
Diarrhoea, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.76  (34.24)
Diarrhoea, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (33.24)
Diarrhoea, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (17.82)
Diarrhoea, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (22.10)
Diarrhoea, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (12.60)
Diarrhoea, Week 165 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Diarrhoea, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (25.20)
Diarrhoea, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
-13.33  (29.81)
Diarrhoea, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Diarrhoea, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Diarrhoea, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Diarrhoea, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
6.06  (29.13) 0.00  (13.61)
Financial Difficulties, Baseline Number Analyzed 291 participants 146 participants
22.22  (28.81) 20.32  (28.60)
Financial Difficulties, Week 6 Number Analyzed 219 participants 115 participants
-3.20  (27.00) 0.00  (25.74)
Financial Difficulties, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 64 participants
-4.95  (27.59) 1.56  (26.18)
Financial Difficulties, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 40 participants
-4.41  (23.94) 4.17  (27.41)
Financial Difficulties, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 30 participants
-4.76  (30.11) 2.22  (23.05)
Financial Difficulties, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
-3.21  (24.20) -1.45  (23.52)
Financial Difficulties, Week 36 Number Analyzed 62 participants 15 participants
-2.69  (28.50) 4.44  (21.33)
Financial Difficulties, Week 42 Number Analyzed 54 participants 14 participants
-1.85  (33.28) 2.38  (27.62)
Financial Difficulties, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-0.76  (29.19) -5.56  (27.83)
Financial Difficulties, Week 57 Number Analyzed 37 participants 8 participants
-4.50  (32.55) -4.17  (21.36)
Financial Difficulties, Week 66 Number Analyzed 33 participants 5 participants
0.00  (28.87) -6.67  (27.89)
Financial Difficulties, Week 75 Number Analyzed 26 participants 4 participants
1.28  (29.03) 8.33  (31.91)
Financial Difficulties, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
3.51  (26.98) -22.22  (19.25)
Financial Difficulties, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
0.00  (26.49) -16.67  (23.57)
Financial Difficulties, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
2.08  (25.73) -33.33 [1]   (NA)
Financial Difficulties, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (27.62)
Financial Difficulties, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (27.62)
Financial Difficulties, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (24.33)
Financial Difficulties, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (30.56)
Financial Difficulties, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (27.62)
Financial Difficulties, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (31.71)
Financial Difficulties, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
4.17  (37.53)
Financial Difficulties, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (31.71)
Financial Difficulties, Week 183 Number Analyzed 5 participants 0 participants
0.00  (23.57)
Financial Difficulties, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (27.22)
Financial Difficulties, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
16.67  (23.57)
Financial Difficulties, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Financial Difficulties, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
-3.03  (43.34) 0.00  (27.22)
[1]
The standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values. Number analyzed is 1 so standard deviation is not available.
8.Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ Supplementary Lung Cancer Module 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13) Score
Hide Description The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module incorporates one multiple item scale to assess dyspnea and a series of single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life); however, a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by participants as clinically significant (Osoba et al. 1998).
Time Frame Baseline, Day 1 of each treatment cycle up to 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 55 months) (Cycle length = 21 days)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Mean (Standard Deviation)
Unit of Measure: units of a scale
Dyspnoea, Baseline Number Analyzed 287 participants 140 participants
34.30  (25.69) 36.67  (25.35)
Dyspnoea, Week 6 Number Analyzed 207 participants 109 participants
1.13  (19.90) 0.92  (24.25)
Dyspnoea, Week 12 Number Analyzed 144 participants 62 participants
-0.23  (24.28) -2.87  (24.55)
Dyspnoea, Week 18 Number Analyzed 114 participants 37 participants
-4.78  (18.93) 0.90  (23.33)
Dyspnoea, Week 24 Number Analyzed 99 participants 29 participants
-5.05  (22.91) 2.68  (23.13)
Dyspnoea, Week 30 Number Analyzed 79 participants 22 participants
-5.34  (22.00) 1.52  (25.03)
Dyspnoea, Week 36 Number Analyzed 57 participants 14 participants
-3.90  (26.85) 5.56  (19.85)
Dyspnoea, Week 42 Number Analyzed 48 participants 13 participants
-11.11  (26.63) -6.84  (22.01)
Dyspnoea, Week 48 Number Analyzed 39 participants 12 participants
-4.84  (26.83) 1.85  (22.64)
Dyspnoea, Week 57 Number Analyzed 31 participants 8 participants
-7.89  (20.53) 4.17  (15.64)
Dyspnoea, Week 66 Number Analyzed 27 participants 5 participants
-6.58  (24.12) 0.00  (13.61)
Dyspnoea, Week 75 Number Analyzed 22 participants 4 participants
-4.55  (23.67) -2.78  (30.60)
Dyspnoea, Week 84 Number Analyzed 17 participants 3 participants
-8.50  (23.74) 3.70  (23.13)
Dyspnoea, Week 93 Number Analyzed 19 participants 2 participants
-2.34  (27.61) 5.56  (7.86)
Dyspnoea, Week 102 Number Analyzed 15 participants 1 participants
-2.96  (21.19) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dyspnoea, Week 111 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
-2.56  (26.51)
Dyspnoea, Week 120 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
-4.27  (24.23)
Dyspnoea, Week 129 Number Analyzed 12 participants 0 participants
3.70  (15.95)
Dyspnoea, Week 138 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
0.00  (24.43)
Dyspnoea, Week 147 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
-0.85  (26.24)
Dyspnoea, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
1.59  (14.95)
Dyspnoea, Week 165 Number Analyzed 6 participants 0 participants
-1.85  (21.56)
Dyspnoea, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
1.59  (17.48)
Dyspnoea, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
5.56  (21.28)
Dyspnoea, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
5.56  (26.45)
Dyspnoea, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (15.71)
Dyspnoea, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dyspnoea, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 12 participants
12.12  (29.17) 6.48  (31.94)
Coughing, Baseline Number Analyzed 295 participants 147 participants
41.36  (30.24) 46.26  (28.25)
Coughing, Week 6 Number Analyzed 222 participants 116 participants
-1.80  (25.10) -5.46  (29.80)
Coughing, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 64 participants
-7.61  (30.79) -9.38  (29.97)
Coughing, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 39 participants
-9.64  (29.01) -3.42  (34.87)
Coughing, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
-11.01  (30.42) 3.33  (30.76)
Coughing, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 24 participants
-9.24  (33.46) 0.00  (26.01)
Coughing, Week 36 Number Analyzed 61 participants 16 participants
-7.10  (35.02) 0.00  (34.43)
Coughing, Week 42 Number Analyzed 53 participants 14 participants
-10.06  (31.07) -2.38  (27.62)
Coughing, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-15.91  (30.06) 0.00  (20.10)
Coughing, Week 57 Number Analyzed 35 participants 8 participants
-14.29  (31.61) 4.17  (27.82)
Coughing, Week 66 Number Analyzed 32 participants 5 participants
-11.46  (33.45) -13.33  (18.26)
Coughing, Week 75 Number Analyzed 25 participants 4 participants
-9.33  (28.09) -8.33  (16.67)
Coughing, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-19.30  (32.04) 11.11  (19.25)
Coughing, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-21.67  (31.11) 16.67  (23.57)
Coughing, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-14.58  (20.97) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Coughing, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-11.90  (21.11)
Coughing, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-11.90  (21.11)
Coughing, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (21.54)
Coughing, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (21.68)
Coughing, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-21.43  (24.83)
Coughing, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-23.81  (31.71)
Coughing, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (35.63)
Coughing, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-19.05  (32.53)
Coughing, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (27.22)
Coughing, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (19.25)
Coughing, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Coughing, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Coughing, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
3.03  (37.87) -17.95  (25.88)
Haemoptysis, Baseline Number Analyzed 296 participants 146 participants
5.86  (14.38) 7.76  (18.79)
Haemoptysis, Week 6 Number Analyzed 223 participants 115 participants
0.75  (19.10) -4.64  (21.58)
Haemoptysis, Week 12 Number Analyzed 148 participants 63 participants
-1.80  (15.45) -3.17  (20.49)
Haemoptysis, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 39 participants
-1.64  (15.95) -1.71  (17.01)
Haemoptysis, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
-2.52  (13.57) -1.11  (18.54)
Haemoptysis, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-3.97  (14.08) -2.90  (13.90)
Haemoptysis, Week 36 Number Analyzed 60 participants 16 participants
-1.67  (17.81) -6.25  (18.13)
Haemoptysis, Week 42 Number Analyzed 53 participants 14 participants
-1.26  (15.96) -2.38  (20.52)
Haemoptysis, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-3.79  (12.89) -5.56  (19.25)
Haemoptysis, Week 57 Number Analyzed 36 participants 8 participants
-2.78  (18.47) -8.33  (23.57)
Haemoptysis, Week 66 Number Analyzed 31 participants 5 participants
-2.15  (11.97) 0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 75 Number Analyzed 25 participants 4 participants
-1.33  (11.71) 0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-3.51  (10.51) 0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-1.67  (13.13) 0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
-2.08  (8.33) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Haemoptysis, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (8.91)
Haemoptysis, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (8.91)
Haemoptysis, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (8.91)
Haemoptysis, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (8.91)
Haemoptysis, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (8.91)
Haemoptysis, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Haemoptysis, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Haemoptysis, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
3.03  (17.98) -2.56  (16.45)
Sore Mouth, Baseline Number Analyzed 296 participants 146 participants
4.17  (13.50) 5.02  (14.83)
Sore Mouth, Week 6 Number Analyzed 223 participants 115 participants
1.64  (19.30) 0.00  (20.23)
Sore Mouth, Week 12 Number Analyzed 150 participants 64 participants
-0.22  (17.91) 0.00  (16.80)
Sore Mouth, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 39 participants
-0.82  (16.85) 2.56  (20.78)
Sore Mouth, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 29 participants
-1.90  (19.52) 2.30  (17.66)
Sore Mouth, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-3.57  (21.96) 0.00  (17.41)
Sore Mouth, Week 36 Number Analyzed 61 participants 16 participants
-2.73  (22.19) -2.08  (19.12)
Sore Mouth, Week 42 Number Analyzed 53 participants 14 participants
0.00  (29.24) 4.76  (28.81)
Sore Mouth, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-5.30  (18.94) -2.78  (22.29)
Sore Mouth, Week 57 Number Analyzed 36 participants 8 participants
-5.56  (20.31) 0.00  (17.82)
Sore Mouth, Week 66 Number Analyzed 32 participants 5 participants
-4.17  (16.40) 6.67  (14.91)
Sore Mouth, Week 75 Number Analyzed 25 participants 4 participants
-5.33  (15.75) 16.67  (19.25)
Sore Mouth, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-1.75  (7.65) 11.11  (19.25)
Sore Mouth, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
-1.67  (7.45) 0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
2.08  (8.33) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Sore Mouth, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (22.65)
Sore Mouth, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (8.91)
Sore Mouth, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (17.82)
Sore Mouth, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (8.91)
Sore Mouth, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
4.17  (27.82)
Sore Mouth, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Sore Mouth, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Sore Mouth, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
27.27  (32.72) 0.00  (19.25)
Dysphagia, Baseline Number Analyzed 296 participants 146 participants
11.15  (23.60) 8.68  (19.60)
Dysphagia, Week 6 Number Analyzed 223 participants 115 participants
-1.20  (20.47) 2.90  (25.96)
Dysphagia, Week 12 Number Analyzed 151 participants 64 participants
-0.44  (21.77) -1.04  (23.73)
Dysphagia, Week 18 Number Analyzed 122 participants 39 participants
-2.19  (23.37) -0.85  (29.11)
Dysphagia, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
-4.72  (23.20) 1.11  (28.34)
Dysphagia, Week 30 Number Analyzed 84 participants 23 participants
-3.57  (23.15) 2.90  (28.27)
Dysphagia, Week 36 Number Analyzed 60 participants 16 participants
-6.11  (28.45) 6.25  (13.44)
Dysphagia, Week 42 Number Analyzed 53 participants 14 participants
-7.55  (31.11) 4.76  (17.82)
Dysphagia, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
-5.30  (23.78) 0.00  (14.21)
Dysphagia, Week 57 Number Analyzed 36 participants 8 participants
-3.70  (29.58) 4.17  (21.36)
Dysphagia, Week 66 Number Analyzed 31 participants 5 participants
-6.45  (32.68) 0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 75 Number Analyzed 25 participants 4 participants
-4.00  (27.76) 16.67  (33.33)
Dysphagia, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
-8.77  (33.04) 0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
0.00  (28.61) 0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
0.00  (0.00) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dysphagia, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (22.10)
Dysphagia, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (8.91)
Dysphagia, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-2.38  (20.52)
Dysphagia, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.76  (12.10)
Dysphagia, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (28.81)
Dysphagia, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-8.33  (23.57)
Dysphagia, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Dysphagia, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
16.67  (23.57)
Dysphagia, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Dysphagia, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
12.12  (37.34) 0.00  (19.25)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Baseline Number Analyzed 296 participants 146 participants
11.26  (21.10) 14.84  (24.46)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 6 Number Analyzed 223 participants 115 participants
3.29  (19.74) 1.45  (25.51)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 12 Number Analyzed 151 participants 64 participants
1.99  (21.16) 2.08  (26.48)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 39 participants
1.10  (19.21) 5.13  (24.83)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 24 Number Analyzed 106 participants 30 participants
3.77  (23.60) 7.78  (22.63)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
4.82  (20.25) -1.45  (21.27)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 36 Number Analyzed 60 participants 16 participants
7.78  (24.83) 12.50  (29.50)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 42 Number Analyzed 53 participants 14 participants
8.18  (23.48) 9.52  (20.37)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 12 participants
6.82  (23.38) 8.33  (20.72)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 57 Number Analyzed 36 participants 8 participants
7.41  (25.34) 20.83  (30.54)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 66 Number Analyzed 32 participants 5 participants
6.25  (23.09) 13.33  (38.01)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 75 Number Analyzed 25 participants 4 participants
5.33  (22.93) 8.33  (31.91)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
8.77  (21.78) 0.00  (0.00)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
6.67  (17.44) 0.00  (0.00)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
6.25  (18.13) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (15.82)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (15.82)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (15.82)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (13.07)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (15.82)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (12.60)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
0.00  (17.82)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-4.76  (12.60)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-8.33  (16.67)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
16.67  (43.03)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Peripheral Neuropathy, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 12 participants
21.21  (40.20) -2.78  (33.21)
Alopecia, Baseline Number Analyzed 295 participants 145 participants
7.91  (20.70) 4.83  (15.70)
Alopecia, Week 6 Number Analyzed 220 participants 115 participants
-1.06  (19.48) 6.09  (27.07)
Alopecia, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 63 participants
-2.01  (17.43) 7.94  (27.90)
Alopecia, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 39 participants
-1.93  (17.90) 12.82  (23.71)
Alopecia, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 28 participants
-1.27  (17.86) 14.29  (30.67)
Alopecia, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 23 participants
-1.20  (19.79) 10.14  (27.40)
Alopecia, Week 36 Number Analyzed 60 participants 16 participants
5.56  (17.54) 10.42  (29.11)
Alopecia, Week 42 Number Analyzed 52 participants 14 participants
3.85  (14.24) 7.14  (29.75)
Alopecia, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 12 participants
3.10  (17.54) 13.89  (36.12)
Alopecia, Week 57 Number Analyzed 35 participants 8 participants
7.62  (18.23) 29.17  (27.82)
Alopecia, Week 66 Number Analyzed 30 participants 5 participants
6.67  (13.56) 6.67  (14.91)
Alopecia, Week 75 Number Analyzed 24 participants 4 participants
5.56  (12.69) 8.33  (16.67)
Alopecia, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 3 participants
1.75  (7.65) 11.11  (19.25)
Alopecia, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 2 participants
5.00  (12.21) 16.67  (23.57)
Alopecia, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 1 participants
4.17  (11.39) 33.33 [1]   (NA)
Alopecia, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (8.91)
Alopecia, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.76  (12.10)
Alopecia, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (8.91)
Alopecia, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
7.14  (19.30)
Alopecia, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (8.91)
Alopecia, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Alopecia, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Alopecia, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Alopecia, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Alopecia, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
8.33  (16.67)
Alopecia, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
16.67  (23.57)
Alopecia, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Alopecia, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
0.00  (0.00) 12.82  (44.18)
Pain in Chest, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 144 participants
20.29  (26.70) 19.91  (24.72)
Pain in Chest, Week 6 Number Analyzed 218 participants 114 participants
-2.45  (26.66) -4.09  (29.79)
Pain in Chest, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 63 participants
-4.03  (27.65) -5.29  (31.80)
Pain in Chest, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 38 participants
-9.37  (27.29) -5.26  (26.31)
Pain in Chest, Week 24 Number Analyzed 105 participants 29 participants
-7.62  (28.22) -2.30  (28.07)
Pain in Chest, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 22 participants
-7.23  (31.26) -9.09  (34.40)
Pain in Chest, Week 36 Number Analyzed 60 participants 14 participants
-11.67  (29.96) 2.38  (30.56)
Pain in Chest, Week 42 Number Analyzed 52 participants 13 participants
-11.54  (34.86) -2.56  (31.80)
Pain in Chest, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 11 participants
-17.83  (28.50) 3.03  (17.98)
Pain in Chest, Week 57 Number Analyzed 35 participants 7 participants
-18.10  (30.62) -4.76  (23.00)
Pain in Chest, Week 66 Number Analyzed 31 participants 4 participants
-15.05  (34.25) -16.67  (19.25)
Pain in Chest, Week 75 Number Analyzed 24 participants 3 participants
-13.89  (21.80) -22.22  (19.25)
Pain in Chest, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 2 participants
-22.81  (31.53) -16.67  (23.57)
Pain in Chest, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 1 participants
-23.33  (26.71) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Pain in Chest, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 0 participants
-20.83  (31.91)
Pain in Chest, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-26.19  (29.75)
Pain in Chest, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-26.19  (29.75)
Pain in Chest, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-21.43  (21.11)
Pain in Chest, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-26.19  (29.75)
Pain in Chest, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-19.05  (36.31)
Pain in Chest, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-23.81  (25.20)
Pain in Chest, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-25.00  (23.57)
Pain in Chest, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-23.81  (25.20)
Pain in Chest, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (33.33)
Pain in Chest, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (33.33)
Pain in Chest, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-33.33  (47.14)
Pain in Chest, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-66.67 [1]   (NA)
Pain in Chest, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
0.00  (21.08) 12.82  (21.68)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Baseline Number Analyzed 294 participants 145 participants
19.16  (28.08) 19.08  (27.43)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 6 Number Analyzed 221 participants 114 participants
-0.45  (26.87) -0.58  (29.07)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 12 Number Analyzed 149 participants 63 participants
0.67  (29.38) -4.23  (30.81)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 18 Number Analyzed 121 participants 38 participants
-1.65  (30.08) -2.63  (34.99)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 24 Number Analyzed 104 participants 28 participants
-3.21  (27.68) 0.00  (28.69)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 30 Number Analyzed 83 participants 22 participants
-0.40  (26.80) 4.55  (25.81)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 36 Number Analyzed 60 participants 15 participants
-4.44  (23.34) -2.22  (34.43)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 42 Number Analyzed 53 participants 13 participants
-1.89  (25.67) -5.13  (38.12)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 48 Number Analyzed 44 participants 11 participants
-1.52  (28.71) -6.06  (35.96)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 57 Number Analyzed 36 participants 7 participants
7.41  (25.34) -9.52  (37.09)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 66 Number Analyzed 31 participants 4 participants
1.08  (26.50) -33.33  (38.49)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 75 Number Analyzed 24 participants 3 participants
-1.39  (26.88) -33.33  (33.33)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 2 participants
3.51  (24.58) -16.67  (23.57)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 1 participants
6.67  (23.20) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 0 participants
8.33  (25.82)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 111 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (27.62)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
4.76  (25.68)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (27.62)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (24.33)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
2.38  (27.62)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
9.52  (16.27)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
4.17  (11.79)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
25.00  (31.91)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
0.00  (0.00)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
0.00 [1]   (NA)
Pain in Arm or Shoulder, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
12.12  (42.88) 7.69  (33.76)
Pain in other parts, Baseline Number Analyzed 287 participants 144 participants
25.32  (31.93) 27.55  (31.86)
Pain in other parts, Week 6 Number Analyzed 216 participants 113 participants
-1.85  (29.05) 1.18  (33.31)
Pain in other parts, Week 12 Number Analyzed 147 participants 62 participants
-0.91  (32.63) -0.54  (34.93)
Pain in other parts, Week 18 Number Analyzed 115 participants 36 participants
-1.74  (36.63) 11.11  (36.51)
Pain in other parts, Week 24 Number Analyzed 104 participants 28 participants
-3.53  (35.35) -4.76  (38.18)
Pain in other parts, Week 30 Number Analyzed 81 participants 22 participants
-2.88  (38.08) -7.58  (20.40)
Pain in other parts, Week 36 Number Analyzed 59 participants 15 participants
-5.08  (33.23) 2.22  (29.46)
Pain in other parts, Week 42 Number Analyzed 50 participants 13 participants
-2.67  (33.56) -12.82  (32.03)
Pain in other parts, Week 48 Number Analyzed 43 participants 11 participants
-4.65  (27.78) -15.15  (34.52)
Pain in other parts, Week 57 Number Analyzed 34 participants 7 participants
-1.96  (34.76) -9.52  (31.71)
Pain in other parts, Week 66 Number Analyzed 29 participants 4 participants
3.45  (37.10) -16.67  (43.03)
Pain in other parts, Week 75 Number Analyzed 24 participants 3 participants
8.33  (31.47) 0.00  (0.00)
Pain in other parts, Week 84 Number Analyzed 19 participants 2 participants
-1.75  (39.24) 0.00  (0.00)
Pain in other parts, Week 93 Number Analyzed 20 participants 1 participants
-3.33  (28.41) 0.00 [1]   (NA)
Pain in other parts, Week 102 Number Analyzed 16 participants 0 participants
-4.17  (26.87)
Pain in other parts, Week 111 Number Analyzed 13 participants 0 participants
-5.13  (29.96)
Pain in other parts, Week 120 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (26.15)
Pain in other parts, Week 129 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (14.19)
Pain in other parts, Week 138 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
-7.14  (19.30)
Pain in other parts, Week 147 Number Analyzed 14 participants 0 participants
0.00  (18.49)
Pain in other parts, Week 156 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-14.29  (26.23)
Pain in other parts, Week 165 Number Analyzed 8 participants 0 participants
-16.67  (25.20)
Pain in other parts, Week 174 Number Analyzed 7 participants 0 participants
-9.52  (31.71)
Pain in other parts, Week 183 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
8.33  (63.10)
Pain in other parts, Week 192 Number Analyzed 4 participants 0 participants
-8.33  (31.91)
Pain in other parts, Week 201 Number Analyzed 2 participants 0 participants
-33.33  (0.00)
Pain in other parts, Week 210 Number Analyzed 1 participants 0 participants
-66.67 [1]   (NA)
Pain in other parts, Safety Follow-Up Visit Number Analyzed 11 participants 13 participants
9.09  (42.40) 0.00  (33.33)
[1]
The standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values. Number analyzed is 1 so standard deviation is not available.
9.Secondary Outcome
Title Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 Score
Hide Description TTD with use of the EORTC is defined as the time from randomization to the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in EORTC symptom scores. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in lung cancer symptoms is defined as a = 10-point increase above baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial = 10-point increase above baseline followed by either (a) death within 6 weeks from the last assessment through Week 48 or (b) death within 9 weeks from the last assessment from Week 48 thereafter. A = 10-point change in the EORTC scale score is perceived by participants as clinically significant (Osoba et al. 1998).
Time Frame From baseline up to approximately 55 months
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
Dyspnoea
NA [1] 
(19.0 to NA)
NA [1] 
(8.3 to NA)
Fatigue
13.5 [1] 
(8.3 to NA)
8.4 [1] 
(5.6 to NA)
[1]
Median and/or CI are not estimable due to insufficient number of patients with events.
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to deterioration for Dyspnoea (single item QLQ-C30)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.975
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 1.01
Confidence Interval 95%
0.57 to 1.78
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to deterioration for Fatigue (multi items QLQ-C30)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.620
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.89
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.55 to 1.42
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
10.Secondary Outcome
Title Time to Deterioration in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms As Assessed by EORTC QLQ-LC13 Score
Hide Description TTD with use of the EORTC is defined as the time from randomization to the first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in EORTC symptom scores. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in lung cancer symptoms is defined as a = 10-point increase above baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial = 10-point increase above baseline followed by either (a) death within 6 weeks from the last assessment through Week 48 or (b) death within 9 weeks from the last assessment from Week 48 thereafter. A = 10-point change in the EORTC scale score is perceived by participants as clinically significant.
Time Frame From baseline up to approximately 55 months
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population is defined as all randomized participants irrespective of whether the assigned treatment was actually received.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 302 151
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
Cough
NA [1] 
(NA to NA)
21.4 [1] 
(13.9 to NA)
Chest Pain
NA [1] 
(NA to NA)
NA [1] 
(6.8 to NA)
Dyspnoea
17.3
(9.6 to 34.2)
8.3 [1] 
(5.5 to NA)
Arm and/or Shoulder Pain
21.3 [1] 
(13.6 to NA)
13.9 [1] 
(8.6 to NA)
Composite of Cough, Dyspnea and Chest Pain
8.3
(5.5 to 17.3)
4.2
(2.9 to 5.6)
[1]
Median and/or CI are not estimable due to insufficient number of patients with events.
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to deterioration for Cough (single item QLQ-LC13)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.653
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 1.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.60 to 2.26
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to deterioration for Chest pain (single item QLQ-LC13)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.036
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.51
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.27 to 0.97
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to deterioration for Dyspnoea (multiple items QLQ-LC13)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.125
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.70
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.45 to 1.11
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to deterioration for Arm and/or shoulder pain (single item QLQ-LC13)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.362
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.75
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.41 to 1.39
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Hide Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments Time to Confirmed Deterioration for the Composite of the 3 following symptoms: cough, dyspnoea (multi-items QLQ-LC13) and chest pain
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.041
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.68
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.46 to 0.99
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
11.Secondary Outcome
Title Overall Survival in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Status
Hide Description Overall survival will be assessed in participants whose tumors express PD-L1 protein as measured by PD-L1 SP263 IHC assay.
Time Frame From randomization up to death from any cause (up to approximately 55 months)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
PD-L1 Positive Status ITT Population
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 127 78
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
9.4
(7.0 to 11.3)
10.3
(7.1 to 12.3)
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments SP263 TC>=1%
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.272
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.84
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.61 to 1.15
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
12.Secondary Outcome
Title Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Status
Hide Description Investigator-assessed PFS according to RECIST v1.1 assessed in participants whose tumors express PD-L1 protein as measured by PD-L1 SP263 IHC assay.
Time Frame From randomization to the first occurence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 55 months)
Hide Outcome Measure Data
Hide Analysis Population Description
Participants With PD-L1 Positive Status ITT Population.
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description:
Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death.
Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
Overall Number of Participants Analyzed 127 78
Median (95% Confidence Interval)
Unit of Measure: Months
4.2
(2.9 to 5.8)
3.0
(2.8 to 5.4)
Hide Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Atezolizumab, Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Comments SP263 TC>=1%
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments Stratified analysis. Histologic subtype, PD-L1 IHC status and brain metastases (Yes/No) were added as stratification factors.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis P-Value 0.366
Comments [Not Specified]
Method Log Rank
Comments [Not Specified]
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.64 to 1.18
Estimation Comments [Not Specified]
Time Frame From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 30 April 2022 (up to approximately 55 months)
Adverse Event Reporting Description All-cause mortality reported for deaths that occurred during study based on ITT, which included all randomized participants. Serious & other adverse events reported based on safety population, which included participants who received any amount of any study drug.
 
Arm/Group Title Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Hide Arm/Group Description Participants received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, participant or physician decision to discontinue, or death. Participants received single agent chemotherapy; either vinorelbine oral or IV, or gemcitabine IV, according to the label based on investigator's choice.
All-Cause Mortality
Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Affected / at Risk (%) Affected / at Risk (%)
Total   236/302 (78.15%)      127/151 (84.11%)    
Hide Serious Adverse Events
Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total   146/300 (48.67%)      53/147 (36.05%)    
Blood and lymphatic system disorders     
Anaemia  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Disseminated intravascular coagulation  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Febrile neutropenia  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 3/147 (2.04%)  3
Leukocytosis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Myelosuppression  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Neutropenia  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Cardiac disorders     
Acute coronary syndrome  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Acute left ventricular failure  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Acute myocardial infarction  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Angina pectoris  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Atrial fibrillation  1  3/300 (1.00%)  3 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Cardiac arrest  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Cardiac disorder  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Cardiac failure  1  3/300 (1.00%)  3 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Cardiac failure congestive  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Myocardial infarction  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Myocardial ischaemia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Myocarditis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Sinus tachycardia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Gastrointestinal disorders     
Abdominal pain  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Colitis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Diverticulum intestinal  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Gastrointestinal toxicity  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Ileus  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Inguinal hernia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pancreatitis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Small intestinal perforation  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Vomiting  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
General disorders     
Asthenia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Chest pain  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Death  1  7/300 (2.33%)  7 2/147 (1.36%)  2
General physical health deterioration  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Generalised oedema  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Infusion site extravasation  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Malaise  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Non-cardiac chest pain  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Oedema  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Performance status decreased  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pyrexia  1  3/300 (1.00%)  3 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Sudden cardiac death  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hepatobiliary disorders     
Cholangitis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hepatitis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Immune-mediated hepatitis  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Liver injury  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Immune system disorders     
Systemic immune activation  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Infections and infestations     
Appendicitis  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Brain abscess  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Bronchitis  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 1/147 (0.68%)  1
COVID-19  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Cellulitis  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Diarrhoea infectious  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Enterocolitis bacterial  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Erysipelas  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Gastrointestinal infection  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Infectious pleural effusion  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways disease  1  5/300 (1.67%)  5 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Influenza  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Lower respiratory tract infection  1  5/300 (1.67%)  5 4/147 (2.72%)  5
Neutropenic sepsis  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Pneumonia  1  33/300 (11.00%)  37 11/147 (7.48%)  13
Pneumonia aspiration  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pneumonia bacterial  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pneumonia fungal  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pneumonia pneumococcal  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Relapsing fever  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Respiratory tract infection  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Sepsis  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 4/147 (2.72%)  4
Septic shock  1  2/300 (0.67%)  3 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Skin infection  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Upper respiratory tract infection  1  3/300 (1.00%)  3 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Urinary tract infection  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Urinary tract infection bacterial  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications     
Fall  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Femoral neck fracture  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Femur fracture  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Lumbar vertebral fracture  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Radiation oesophagitis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Rib fracture  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Investigations     
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status worsened  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Metabolism and nutrition disorders     
Diabetic ketoacidosis  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hypercalcaemia  1  2/300 (0.67%)  3 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hyperglycaemia  1  3/300 (1.00%)  7 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hypoalbuminaemia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hypoglycaemia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hypokalaemia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Hyponatraemia  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Type 2 diabetes mellitus  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders     
Flank pain  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Fracture pain  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Intervertebral disc protrusion  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Osteoarthritis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Rheumatoid arthritis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)     
Adenocarcinoma of colon  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Nervous system disorders     
Cerebral infarction  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Cerebrovascular accident  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Haemorrhage intracranial  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Ischaemic cerebral infarction  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Ischaemic stroke  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Lacunar infarction  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Lacunar stroke  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Myasthenia gravis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Seizure  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Spinal cord compression  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Syncope  1  2/300 (0.67%)  4 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Transient ischaemic attack  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Psychiatric disorders     
Confusional state  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Disorientation  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Renal and urinary disorders     
Acute kidney injury  1  3/300 (1.00%)  3 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Haematuria  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Urinary retention  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Reproductive system and breast disorders     
Benign prostatic hyperplasia  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders     
Acute respiratory failure  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Asthma  1  1/300 (0.33%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  1  7/300 (2.33%)  7 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Dyspnoea  1  6/300 (2.00%)  6 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Haemoptysis  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Hypoxia  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Immune-mediated lung disease  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Laryngeal haemorrhage  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pleural effusion  1  9/300 (3.00%)  10 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Pneumonitis  1  8/300 (2.67%)  9 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Pneumothorax  1  3/300 (1.00%)  4 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Pulmonary embolism  1  3/300 (1.00%)  3 3/147 (2.04%)  3
Pulmonary hypertension  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Respiratory arrest  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Respiratory failure  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders     
Rash  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Vascular disorders     
Capillary leak syndrome  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Deep vein thrombosis  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Peripheral ischaemia  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
Superior vena cava occlusion  1  0/300 (0.00%)  0 1/147 (0.68%)  1
1
Term from vocabulary, MedDRA version 25.0
Indicates events were collected by systematic assessment
Hide Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Frequency Threshold for Reporting Other Adverse Events 5%
Atezolizumab Single Agent Chemotherapy (Vinorelbine or Gemcitabine)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total   234/300 (78.00%)      128/147 (87.07%)    
Blood and lymphatic system disorders     
Anaemia  1  48/300 (16.00%)  55 48/147 (32.65%)  70
Leukopenia  1  4/300 (1.33%)  4 11/147 (7.48%)  15
Neutropenia  1  2/300 (0.67%)  3 18/147 (12.24%)  39
Endocrine disorders     
Hypothyroidism  1  19/300 (6.33%)  22 0/147 (0.00%)  0
Gastrointestinal disorders     
Constipation  1  47/300 (15.67%)  60 29/147 (19.73%)  32
Diarrhoea  1  40/300 (13.33%)  57 24/147 (16.33%)  45
Nausea  1  32/300 (10.67%)  40 35/147 (23.81%)  53
Vomiting  1  25/300 (8.33%)  33 22/147 (14.97%)  41
General disorders     
Asthenia  1  43/300 (14.33%)  49 19/147 (12.93%)  25
Fatigue  1  57/300 (19.00%)  73 34/147 (23.13%)  34
Oedema peripheral  1  25/300 (8.33%)  28 6/147 (4.08%)  6
Pyrexia  1  30/300 (10.00%)  35 9/147 (6.12%)  17
Infections and infestations     
Pneumonia  1  15/300 (5.00%)  16 5/147 (3.40%)  5
Urinary tract infection  1  29/300 (9.67%)  46 12/147 (8.16%)  15
Investigations     
Blood creatinine increased  1  15/300 (5.00%)  25 4/147 (2.72%)  5
Neutrophil count decreased  1  1/300 (0.33%)  1 17/147 (11.56%)  25
Weight decreased  1  22/300 (7.33%)  29 11/147 (7.48%)  12
White blood cell count decreased  1  2/300 (0.67%)  2 14/147 (9.52%)  24
Metabolism and nutrition disorders     
Decreased appetite  1  66/300 (22.00%)  74 32/147 (21.77%)  39
Hypokalaemia  1  17/300 (5.67%)  26 2/147 (1.36%)  2
Hyponatraemia  1  25/300 (8.33%)  28 7/147 (4.76%)  7
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders     
Arthralgia  1  27/300 (9.00%)  35 12/147 (8.16%)  15
Back pain  1  25/300 (8.33%)  29 13/147 (8.84%)  14
Pain in extremity  1  12/300 (4.00%)  12 8/147 (5.44%)  9
Nervous system disorders     
Dizziness  1  14/300 (4.67%)  18 8/147 (5.44%)  10
Headache  1  15/300 (5.00%)  20 7/147 (4.76%)  7
Psychiatric disorders     
Insomnia  1  17/300 (5.67%)  18 5/147 (3.40%)  5
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders     
Cough  1  59/300 (19.67%)  72 13/147 (8.84%)  14
Dyspnoea  1  55/300 (18.33%)  59 14/147 (9.52%)  15
Haemoptysis  1  19/300 (6.33%)  26 9/147 (6.12%)  10
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders     
Pruritus  1  23/300 (7.67%)  34 3/147 (2.04%)  3
Rash  1  30/300 (10.00%)  45 5/147 (3.40%)  7
Vascular disorders     
Hypertension  1  21/300 (7.00%)  31 7/147 (4.76%)  9
1
Term from vocabulary, MedDRA version 25.0
Indicates events were collected by systematic assessment
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
Results Point of Contact
Layout table for Results Point of Contact information
Name/Title: Medical Communications
Organization: Hoffmann-La Roche
Phone: 800-821-8590
EMail: genentech@druginfo.com
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Hoffmann-La Roche
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03191786    
Other Study ID Numbers: MO29872
2015-004105-16 ( EudraCT Number )
First Submitted: June 15, 2017
First Posted: June 19, 2017
Results First Submitted: April 18, 2023
Results First Posted: May 17, 2023
Last Update Posted: November 7, 2023