Evaluating Impact of NIRAF Detection for Identifying Parathyroid Glands During Parathyroidectomy (NIRAF)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04299425 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : March 6, 2020
Results First Posted : May 13, 2024
Last Update Posted : May 13, 2024
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single (Participant); Primary Purpose: Prevention |
Conditions |
Parathyroid Adenoma Parathyroid Neoplasms Parathyroid Hyperplasia Parathyroid Cancer Hypercalcemia Primary Hyperparathyroidism |
Intervention |
Device: NIRAF Detection Technology |
Enrollment | 160 |
Recruitment Details | |
Pre-assignment Details |
Arm/Group Title | NIRAF Detection Technology + | NIRAF Detection Technology - |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
Parathyroid gland identification will be performed with PTeye using NIRAF detection technology as an adjunctive tool in patients who undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx). NIRAF Detection Technology: Near Infrared Autofluorescence (NIRAF) detection technology or 'PTeye' consists of a disposable fiber-optic probe that emits non-ionizing radiation from a NIR 785 nm laser source, and also transmits the resulting tissue NIRAF to a photo detector. The 785 nm laser source emits a maximum power of 20 mW. The device is FDA cleared for clinical use in general surgeries and dermatological use (Class 2 device). After surgeon identifies a potential parathyroid gland in the surgical field, the surgeon places the fiber-optic probe of PTeye on suspect tissue and presses the device foot-pedal to activate tissue NIRAF measurement. Auditory beep at high frequency with a Detection Ratio > 1.2 is interpreted by device as the suspect tissue being positive for parathyroid. |
Parathyroid gland identification will be performed with the naked eye of the surgeon without using PTeye - NIRAF detection technology in patients who undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
Started | 80 | 80 |
Completed | 80 | 80 |
Not Completed | 0 | 0 |
Arm/Group Title | NIRAF Detection Technology + | NIRAF Detection Technology - | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description |
Parathyroid gland identification will be performed with PTeye using NIRAF detection technology as an adjunctive tool in patients who undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx). NIRAF Detection Technology: Near Infrared Autofluorescence (NIRAF) detection technology or 'PTeye' consists of a disposable fiber-optic probe that emits non-ionizing radiation from a NIR 785 nm laser source, and also transmits the resulting tissue NIRAF to a photo detector. The 785 nm laser source emits a maximum power of 20 mW. The device is FDA cleared for clinical use in general surgeries and dermatological use (Class 2 device). After surgeon identifies a potential parathyroid gland in the surgical field, the surgeon places the fiber-optic probe of PTeye on suspect tissue and presses the device foot-pedal to activate tissue NIRAF measurement. Auditory beep at high frequency with a Detection Ratio > 1.2 is interpreted by device as the suspect tissue being positive for parathyroid. |
Parathyroid gland identification will be performed with the naked eye of the surgeon without using PTeye - NIRAF detection technology in patients who undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx). | Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 80 | 80 | 160 | |
Baseline Analysis Population Description |
[Not Specified]
|
|||
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
56.8 (14.6) | 59.8 (14.4) | 58.3 (14.5) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
Female |
62 77.5%
|
63 78.8%
|
125 78.1%
|
|
Male |
18 22.5%
|
17 21.3%
|
35 21.9%
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants |
White |
73 91.3%
|
74 92.5%
|
147 91.9%
|
|
Black |
5 6.3%
|
6 7.5%
|
11 6.9%
|
|
Asian |
1 1.3%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
|
Other |
1 1.3%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants |
Non-Hispanic |
79 98.8%
|
80 100.0%
|
159 99.4%
|
|
Hispanic |
1 1.3%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
United States | Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants |
80 | 80 | 160 | ||
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Kg/m2 |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
30.77 (7.52) | 30.94 (7.72) | 30.85 (7.59) | ||
Diagnosis
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
Primary sporadic HPT |
72 90.0%
|
71 88.8%
|
143 89.4%
|
|
Persistent HPT |
3 3.8%
|
9 11.3%
|
12 7.5%
|
|
Recurrent HPT |
1 1.3%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
|
MEN1 |
2 2.5%
|
0 0.0%
|
2 1.3%
|
|
Parathyroid carcinoma |
1 1.3%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
|
Lithium-induced HPT |
1 1.3%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
|
Preoperative calcium (pg/dL)
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: mg/dL |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
11.115 (0.689) | 11.112 (0.712) | 11.112 (0.712) | ||
Preoperative PTH (pg/mL)
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: pg/mL |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
152.3 (79.8) | 163.6 (139) | 157.9 (112.7) | ||
Preoperative vitamin D
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Mcg |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
36.7 (16) | 39.6 (20.5) | 38.1 (18.2) | ||
Procedure by intention
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 80 participants | 80 participants | 160 participants | |
Focused |
27 33.8%
|
24 30.0%
|
51 31.9%
|
|
Bilateral |
53 66.3%
|
56 70.0%
|
109 68.1%
|
Name/Title: | Dr. Carmen C Solorzano |
Organization: | Vanderbilt University Medical Center |
Phone: | 615-343-2735 |
EMail: | carmen.solorzano@vumc.org |
Responsible Party: | Carmen Solorzano, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04299425 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
IRB 192486 5R01CA212147-02 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Submitted: | March 4, 2020 |
First Posted: | March 6, 2020 |
Results First Submitted: | February 23, 2024 |
Results First Posted: | May 13, 2024 |
Last Update Posted: | May 13, 2024 |