The classic website will no longer be available as of June 25, 2024. Please use the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Evaluation of Quality of Life, Efficacy, and Tolerance of Duac® Gel Compared to Differin® Gel in the Treatment of Acne

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00807014
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 11, 2008
Results First Posted : March 6, 2012
Last Update Posted : March 20, 2012
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
GlaxoSmithKline ( Stiefel, a GSK Company )

Brief Summary:
The objectives of this clinical trial are to compare the quality of life of the subjects, the efficacy and the tolerance of Duac® Gel (gel formulation with a combination of clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin] and 5% benzoyl peroxide), applied once daily, against Differin® Gel (gel with 0.1% adapalene), used once daily, in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Acne Vulgaris Drug: Duac Gel Drug: Differin gel Phase 4

Detailed Description:

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit. It is characterized by the formation of comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, cysts, maculae and scars, generally located on the face, chest and back. Acne pathogenesis is recognized as multifactorial.

Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder. It affects approximately 85% individuals at some point in their lives, generally between 12 and 24 years of age. Although acne is prevalent within this age range, it can persist for many years and its long-term physical and psychological implications can be significant.

There are several medicinal products used to treat acne. However, the therapeutic challenge remains, therefore it is essential to continue investigating effective strategies for the treatment of this disease.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 169 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Single-blind, Multicenter, Parallel, Comparative, Randomized, Phase 4 Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of the Quality of Life, Efficacy and Tolerance of Duac® Gel Against Differin® Gel in the Topical Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris.
Study Start Date : November 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date : August 2008
Actual Study Completion Date : August 2008

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Acne

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Duac Gel
Duac Gel
Drug: Duac Gel
Duac® Gel will be applied to the face once daily at night, for 12 weeks.
Other Name: Duac

Active Comparator: Differin gel
Differin gel
Drug: Differin gel
Differin Gel will be applied to the face once daily at night, for 12 weeks.
Other Name: Differin




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Global Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2 ]
    Skindex-29 is a self-administered QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 items), symptomatic (7 items), and functional (12 items), with domain scores ranging from 0 to 40, 28, and 48, respectively. Lower scores = better QoL. A Global Score (range 0-100) was derived by multiplying the sum of the points for all 29 items by a constant (0.862). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 2 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 for the Indicated Domain Scores and the Global Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 QoL Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12 ]
    Skindex-29 is a self-administered QoL questionnaire comprised of 29 items scored on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=all the time) covering 3 domains: emotional (10 items), symptomatic (7 items), and functional (12 items), with domain scores ranging from 0 to 40, 28, and 48, respectively. Lower scores = better QoL. A Global Score (range 0-100) was derived by multiplying the sum of the points for all 29 items by a constant (0.862). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 2 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0).

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    Lesions were counted on the entire face (defined as the area from the upper part of the jaw to the lower part of the hairline), excluding maculae and non-inflammatory lesions located on the nose or chin. Inflammatory lesions included papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts. Non-inflammatory lesions included closed comedones (whiteheads) and open comedones (blackheads). The total lesion count was calculated as the sum of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. Change from Baseline was calculated as the values at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0).

  3. Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Inflammatory, Non-inflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    Lesions were counted on the entire face (defined as the area from the upper part of the jaw to the lower part of the hairline), excluding maculae and non-inflammatory lesions located on the nose or chin. Inflammatory lesions (IL) included papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts. Non-inflammatory lesions (NIL) included closed comedones (whiteheads) and open comedones (blackheads). Total lesion count was calculated as the sum of IL and NIL. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the values at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline divided by Baseline value * 100.

  4. Correlation Between Skindex-29 Questionnaire Scores and Total Lesion Counts From Baseline to Week 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2 ]
    Analyses were performed to determine whether there was a correlation between the total lesion count and either the global or subdomain Skindex-29 questionnaire scores. Correlations between the Skindex-29 questionnaire scores and total lesion count from Baseline to Week 2 were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients, which ranges from -1 to 1. A score of 0 denotes no correlation, a score approaching 1 denotes correlation, and a score approaching -1 denotes inverse correlation.

  5. Mean Scores for Global Change in Acne Improvement at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 Compared to the Start of Treatment (Prior to Week 1) [ Time Frame: Start of treatment and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    Global change in acne improvement was assessed by the investigator on a 7-point scale: 1=greatly worsened, 2=significantly worsened, 3=slightly worsened, 4=no change, 5=slightly improved, 6=significantly improved, or 7=greatly improved. Global change at the indicated week was assessed in terms of change from the previous week. Change at Week 2, for example, was an assessment of change from Week 1.

  6. Mean Scores for Self-evaluation of Acne Improvement at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 Compared to the Start of Treatment (Prior to Week 1) [ Time Frame: Start of treatment and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    Participants self-evaluated their acne improvement on a 3-point scale: 1=worsened, 2=no changes, and 3=improved.

  7. Mean Acne Grades at Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 Assessed by the Leeds Revised Acne Grading System [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    The acne grade on the participant's face was assessed by the investigator using the LRAG, a photographic scale allowing for the assessment of the clinical status for acne severity for the face, back, and chest. It consists of a 12-grade scale (1, least severe; 12, most severe) for inflammatory visible lesions (les.). For non-inflammatory les., this scale comprises 3 photos of les. of increasing severity (grades 1-3). The scale provides a qualitative assessment of superficial/visible les. and provides consistency and inter-/intra-rater reliability. Grading was performed prior to les. counting.

  8. Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Tolerance Symptoms of Peeling, Erythema, and Dryness [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    Tolerance symptoms of peeling (flaking), erythema (redness of skin), and dryness were evaluated at each visit by the investigator. Possible scores were: 0=absent, 1=mild intermittent, 2=mild persistent, 3=moderate intermittent, 4=moderate persistent, 5=severe intermittent, and 6=severe persistent.

  9. Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Tolerance Symptoms of Itching and Burning [ Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ]
    Tolerance symptoms of itching and burning were evaluated at each visit by participants. Possible scores were: 0=absent, 1=mild intermittent, 2=mild persistent, 3=moderate intermittent, 4=moderate persistent, 5=severe intermittent, and 6=severe persistent.

  10. Number of Participants in the Indicated Categories for Overall Tolerance at Week 12/Early Termination [ Time Frame: Week 12 or Early Termination ]
    Participants were evaluated for overall tolerance to study drug by the investigator at the end of the study (Week 12 or Early Termination). Participants were given the tolerance grades of poor, fair, good, or excellent.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   12 Years to 39 Years   (Child, Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with mild to moderate acne vulgaris on the face,.
  • Subjects of either sex aged between 12 and 39 years, inclusive.
  • Subjects agreeing not to use sun-beds or undergo any UV light treatment for 4 weeks prior to entering the study and to minimize the amount of exposure to direct sunlight for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or sexually active with the potential to have children, and not using a contraception method that is safe from a medical point of view
  • Subjects using anti-androgen containing contraceptives.
  • Subjects who, during the past month, have received oral or topical steroids or antibiotics, or acne treatment of any type, including natural or artificial UV therapy.
  • Subjects who have a history of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to clindamycin phosphate, benzoyl peroxide, adapalene or any components of the medicinal products which will be used during the study.
  • Subjects using, or having used in the past month, any significant concomitant medicinal product which might affect their acne, as judged by the Investigator.
  • Subjects with a history of regional enteritis or ulcerative colitis, or a history of antibiotic-associated colitis.
  • Subjects with a history of photosensitivity.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00807014


Locations
Layout table for location information
Spain
Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, Spain, 08916
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Spain, 08003
Hospital Abente y Lago in La Coruna
La Coruna, Spain
Hospital Universitario Ramón and Cajal
Madrid, Spain, 28034
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Spain, 28041
Hospital Clínico Universitario Ntra. Sra. de the Victoria
Málaga, Spain, 29010
Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona, Spain, 31008
Hospital Clínico de Salamanca
Salamanca, Spain, 37007
Sponsors and Collaborators
Stiefel, a GSK Company
GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Stiefel, a GSK Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00807014    
Other Study ID Numbers: 114567
S194-SP-05/Duac
First Posted: December 11, 2008    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: March 6, 2012
Last Update Posted: March 20, 2012
Last Verified: February 2012
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline ( Stiefel, a GSK Company ):
Differin
quality of life
Acne
Duac
Acne Vulgaris
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris
Acneiform Eruptions
Skin Diseases
Sebaceous Gland Diseases
Adapalene
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Antirheumatic Agents
Dermatologic Agents