Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel as Neo-adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Triple Negative or Luminal B/HER2 Normal BC (GENEVIEVE)
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01779479 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : January 30, 2013
Last Update Posted : August 1, 2017
|
Sponsor:
German Breast Group
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
German Breast Group
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | January 25, 2013 | |||
First Posted Date ICMJE | January 30, 2013 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | August 1, 2017 | |||
Study Start Date ICMJE | February 2013 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | August 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
pathologic complete response (pCR) rate [ Time Frame: 15 months ] | |||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel as Neo-adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Triple Negative or Luminal B/HER2 Normal BC (GENEVIEVE) | |||
Official Title ICMJE | Randomized, Open-label, Phase II Study Comparing the Efficacy and the Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel Given as Neo-adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Operable Triple Negative or Luminal B/HER2 Normal Breast Cancer (GENEVIEVE) | |||
Brief Summary | Cabazitaxel is a new taxoid which promotes the tubulin assembly in vitro and stabilizes microtubules against cold-induced depolymerization as efficiently as docetaxel and was selected for development based on a better antiproliferative activity on resistant cell lines than docetaxel. It has shown superior survival against mitoxantrone (MTX) plus prednisone in docetaxel pre-treated hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer patients leading to registration of the compound. It showed a favorable toxicity profile with an interestingly low rate of alopecia. In the Genevieve study it will be compared against weekly paclitaxel which is currently most widely used treatment of breast cancer patients. A head-to-head comparison in the neoadjuvant setting will allow a rapid and precise comparison of efficacy and tolerability of cabacitaxel versus paclitaxel to decide in how far further development of this taxoid in breast cancer is reasonable. | |||
Detailed Description | Primary Objective To compare the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast (ypT0/is ypN0/+) in patients with operable Triple Negative or luminal B/HER2 normal breast cancer treated with either cabazitaxel or weekly paclitaxel. Secondary Objective To assess
|
|||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | |||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 2 | |||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
|||
Condition ICMJE | Primary Breast Cancer | |||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
|||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
|||
Publications * | Kummel S, Paepke S, Huober J, Schem C, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Eiermann W, Gerber B, Hanusch C, Hilfrich J, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Engels K, Klare P, Fasching PA, von Minckwitz G, Burchardi N, Loibl S. Randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE). Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Jul 30. | |||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | |||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
333 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
326 | |||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | February 2016 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | August 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
|||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | |||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Germany | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01779479 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | GBG 74 2012-003330-16 ( EudraCT Number ) |
|||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Current Responsible Party | German Breast Group | |||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | |||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | German Breast Group | |||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
|||
PRS Account | German Breast Group | |||
Verification Date | February 2016 | |||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |