Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel as Neo-adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Triple Negative or Luminal B/HER2 Normal BC (GENEVIEVE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01779479

Recruitment Status : Completed

First Posted : January 30, 2013

Last Update Posted : August 1, 2017

View this study on the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

German Breast Group

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruitment Status :	Completed
Actual Primary Completion Date :	August 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :	February 2016

Publications of Results:

Kummel S, Paepke S, Huober J, Schem C, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Eiermann W, Gerber B, Hanusch C, Hilfrich J, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Engels K, Klare P, Fasching PA, von Minckwitz G, Burchardi N, Loibl S. Randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE). Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Jul 30.

To Top