Montelukast and Fexofenadine Versus Montelukast and Levocetrizine Combination in Allergic Rhinitis
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02551536 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : September 16, 2015
Last Update Posted : September 16, 2015
|
Tracking Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | August 12, 2015 | ||
First Posted Date ICMJE | September 16, 2015 | ||
Last Update Posted Date | September 16, 2015 | ||
Study Start Date ICMJE | April 2014 | ||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||
Change History | No Changes Posted | ||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
cost effectiveness ratio [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ] direct cost parameters were taken into consideration. Direct cost parameters were cost of medications used, medical procedures and hospitalization charges, if any. Cost-effectiveness ratio of both treatment groups were calculated based on formula as given below.
Cost-effectiveness ratio = cost / outcome Outcome was measured in terms of effectiveness. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter.
|
||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||
Descriptive Information | |||
Brief Title ICMJE | Montelukast and Fexofenadine Versus Montelukast and Levocetrizine Combination in Allergic Rhinitis | ||
Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Montelukast and Levocetirizine Versus Montelukast and Fexofenadine in Patients of Allergic Rhinitis: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial | ||
Brief Summary | Objectives: Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. 10-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistamine, decongestants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of AR.Materials and methods: Seventy patients with allergic rhinitis participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, comparative 4 week trial. The patients between age group of 18-65 years of either gender having moderate-severe intermittent or mild persistent allergic rhinitis were included. The study inclusion criteria required the subjects with Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) of 5 or higher. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups with montelukast-levocetrizine (10 mg and 5 mg) in one group and montelukast-fexofenadine (10 mg and 120 mg) in another group. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter. | ||
Detailed Description | Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. It is the cause of major illness and disability worldwide. Estimates indicate that 10-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. The main symptoms of AR include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, itching, sneezing and non-nasal symptoms like burning, itching and watery eyes or itching ears and palate. These symptoms can have a considerable toll on patient's quality of life by interfering with cognitive and emotional functioning. The estimated annual cost attributable to AR in United States ranges from $1.4 billion to nearly $ 6 billion in direct cost annually. Today's antiallergic therapy is based on avoidance of the causative allergen, symptomatic pharmacotherapy, specific immunotherapy and education. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistaminics, decongestants, leukotrienes receptor antagonists, intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of allergic rhinitis. Second generation antihistamines have become increasingly popular because of their comparable efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects relative to first generation counterparts. Levocetirizine, a potent second generation histamine (H1) receptor antagonist, is effective against persistent allergic rhinitis and thus improves quality of life and reduces co-morbidities and societal costs. Fexofenadine, is a selective, non sedating, second generation H1 receptor antagonist which have an additional impact on the inflammatory mediators. Monteleukast is a highly selective type I receptor antagonist of leukotriene D4. The leukotrienes modifiers have both anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator properties. The literature search establishes that addition of an antihistamine to montelukast has added benefit. The combination therapy of montelukast with antihistamine provide enhancing and complimentary effects thereby reducing the symptoms effectively. The results with concomitant levocetirizine and montelukast treatment are better as compared to monotherapy with levocetirizine on symptoms and quality of life in allergic rhinitis. Fexofenadine along with montelukast is more effective than antihistaminic alone in control of allergic rhinitis symptoms. There is literature available for the comparisons of concomitant levocetirizine and montelukast with monotherapy or placebo and comparisons of concomitant fexofenadine and montelukast with monotherapy or placebo. But scanty data is available regarding comparisons of concomitant montelukast-levocetirizine with montelukast-fexofenadine. |
||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 4 | ||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||
Condition ICMJE | Allergic Rhinitis | ||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||
Recruitment Information | |||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
70 | ||
Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | June 2015 | ||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Removed Location Countries | |||
Administrative Information | |||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02551536 | ||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | IEC/425-26/13 | ||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | ||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Current Responsible Party | DR.MOHINI MAHATME, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla | ||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla | ||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
PRS Account | Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla | ||
Verification Date | September 2015 | ||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |